1ST 4 SECURITY LTD.

Company number SC222736 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Investment Risk Analysis: 1ST 4 SECURITY LTD. (SC222736)

1. Risk Rating: HIGH

The rating reflects significant concerns about the authenticity of financial reporting and the viability of commercial operations. The company has reported identical balance sheet figures for at least nine consecutive years, which is inconsistent with an active trading entity and raises serious questions about the reliability of filed accounts and whether genuine business activity is occurring.

2. Key Concerns

a) Static Financial Position Over Multiple Years The most alarming feature is the repetition of identical figures across 2014-2022: total assets of £50,099, liabilities of £22,598, and net assets of £27,601 (rising from £27,501 in 2014). This extraordinary consistency over nearly a decade is inconsistent with normal business operations and suggests either: the company is dormant despite not being classified as such; accounts are being filed on a "copy prior year" basis without proper review; or there is no genuine trading activity. The 2020 filing confirms £0 turnover, further supporting inactivity.

b) SIC Code Mismatch and Business Identity The registered SIC code 98200 ("Undifferentiated service-producing activities of private households for own use") is fundamentally inconsistent with the company's name suggesting a security services business. This code relates to household activities, not commercial operations. This discrepancy raises questions about the company's actual purpose and whether it is being used as a vehicle for purposes other than stated.

c) Minimal Corporate Governance Structure The company operates with a single director (Derek Hunter) who also holds over 75% of shares and voting rights. There is no company secretary and no apparent separation of ownership and control. For a company incorporated over 20 years ago, the absence of any governance evolution or additional oversight is notable.

3. Positive Indicators

  • Longevity: The company has been incorporated since 2001, demonstrating over two decades of continued registration without dissolution or insolvency proceedings.

  • Filing Compliance: Accounts and confirmation statements are filed and up to date, with no overdue filings noted. This suggests basic administrative compliance is maintained.

  • Positive Net Asset Position: Net assets of £27,601 indicate the company is solvent on paper, with assets exceeding liabilities. No signs of over-leverage apparent from available data.

  • No Adverse Records: No liquidation, administration, or director disqualification records are evident for the sole director.

4. Due Diligence Notes

Financial Verification Required: - Request full breakdown of the £50,099 current assets – given £0 cash was reported in 2014, what comprises this figure? Debtors? Prepayments? Related party balances? - Clarify the nature of the £22,598 creditors due within one year – are these trade creditors, director loans, or other obligations? - Obtain confirmation of whether the company has traded in any year since 2014 and, if so, request turnover and profit & loss figures.

Operational Status: - Determine whether the company should be reclassified as dormant and whether dormant accounts should have been filed instead. - Investigate the SIC code discrepancy – was this an error at incorporation, or does it reflect actual activity? - Confirm whether the company holds any trading contracts, employees, or operational infrastructure.

Director Background: - Conduct full director checks on Derek Hunter, including other directorships and any historical insolvencies connected to other entities. - Verify the registered address is not merely a correspondence point but reflects genuine operational presence.

Related Party Considerations: - Given the single director/owner structure, assess whether asset and liability figures reflect genuine arm's-length transactions or are primarily related party in nature.


Perspective: Investment Risk Assessor · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 24 August 2026