ALIAS (UK) LTD

Company number 06573141 ·

Dissolved

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Financial Health Assessment: ALIAS (UK) LTD

1. Financial Health Score: F

Critical Condition – Company Deceased

This company has been dissolved and exhibited terminal financial decline in its final years. Equity was effectively extinguished, dropping 99.7% from £67,422 to £229 between 2022 and 2023, with no recovery. The patient has passed away.


2. Key Vital Signs

Vital Sign 2024 2023 2022 Trend Status
Total Assets £57,862 £77,947 £118,672 Declining ⬇️ ⚠️ Critical
Total Liabilities £57,633 £77,718 £51,250 Volatile ⚠️ Concerning
Shareholders' Funds £229 £229 £67,422 Collapsed ⬇️ ☠️ Terminal
Cash £63 £162 £115 Depleted ⬇️ ☠️ Terminal
Net Current Assets £229 £229 £67,422 Collapsed ⬇️ ☠️ Terminal
Current Ratio 1.004 1.006 2.32 Deteriorated ⬇️ ⚠️ Critical

Cash – The Pulse Rate

Cash of £63 represents a near-flatline pulse. This company has essentially zero liquidity to meet obligations, fund operations, or respond to any financial shock. A healthy business maintains cash reserves as a buffer; this company had none.

Equity – The Immune System

Shareholders' funds of £229 on total assets of £57,862 gives a equity ratio of just 0.4%. This means 99.6% of the company's assets were financed by liabilities. The financial immune system was completely compromised – any write-off or bad debt would have pushed the company into negative net assets (technical insolvency).

Inter-company Dependencies – The Parasitic Relationship

The balance sheet reveals an unhealthy dependency on group structures: - 100% of debtors (£57,799) are amounts owed by group undertakings - £115 owed to group undertakings as creditors - £57,518 in "other creditors" – likely director loans or related party funding

The company was essentially a conduit within a group structure, with virtually no independent trading substance.


3. Diagnosis

Cause of Death: Extreme Equity Haemorrhage and Cash Starvation

The financial post-mortem reveals a clear sequence of decline:

Phase 1 – Stability (2015-2022): The company maintained reasonable health through this period, with shareholders' funds growing from £27,328 (2015) to £67,422 (2022). Total assets remained in the £116k-£119k range. The company appeared to hold investment property (consistent with SIC code 68100 – buying and selling of own real estate).

Phase 2 – Acute Decline (2022-2023): Something catastrophic occurred between March 2022 and March 2023: - Shareholders' funds collapsed from £67,422 to £229 (a loss of £67,193) - Total assets fell from £118,672 to £77,947 (a reduction of £40,725) - Total liabilities increased from £51,250 to £77,718 (a rise of £26,468) - The property asset appears to have been removed from the balance sheet

The most likely explanation: The company's investment property was transferred out of the company (likely to a group entity or related party), while the associated liability or director loan remained. This stripped the company of its primary asset while leaving obligations in place.

Phase 3 – Terminal Stasis (2023-2024): The company existed in a zombie state – technically alive but with no meaningful activity. Assets and liabilities both reduced in tandem (group debtor being repaid, other creditors being repaid), leaving the same wafer-thin £229 equity. Cash continued to bleed out.

Final Outcome: The company was dissolved, with dissolution date recorded as 4 August 2026 (this may represent a planned future dissolution date or a filing anomaly).

Secondary Conditions:

  1. No Independent Trading Activity: The company had no trade creditors in 2024 (down from just £446 in 2023), suggesting no active trading with external suppliers.

  2. Minimal Share Capital: Only £2 in issued share capital (2 ordinary shares of £1 each), indicating the company was never capitalised with meaningful equity.

  3. Group Dependency: The entire asset base was an inter-company debtor. If the group structure failed or the owing entity became insolvent, this company would have had no recourse.


4. Recommendations (Post-Mortem Lessons)

While this company is beyond saving, the case provides important lessons for stakeholders and similar businesses:

For Directors (Robert Smith & Mike Smith):

  1. Director Loan Accounts: The £57,518 in "other creditors" likely includes director loans. Ensure these were properly dealt with before dissolution – unpaid director loans may still be personally claimable.
  2. Group Reconciliation: Verify that all inter-company balances (£57,799 owed by group undertakings) were properly settled or written off before dissolution.
  3. Tax Clearance: Ensure Corporation Tax obligations were cleared with HMRC, particularly regarding any property disposal that triggered the 2022-2023 asset reduction.

For Group Entities:

  1. Related Party Transactions: Any group company that owed £57,799 to this entity should ensure this balance is properly accounted for in its own records following dissolution.
  2. Asset Transfer Documentation: If property was transferred out, ensure proper documentation exists for tax and legal purposes.

General Business Health Principles (for living companies):

  1. Maintain Minimum Equity Buffers: A company with 0.4% equity ratio has zero resilience. Healthy businesses should maintain equity ratios above 30-40%.
  2. Cash Reserves Are Non-Negotiable: £63 in cash provides no buffer whatsoever. Businesses should maintain a minimum of 3-6 months of operating expenses in liquid reserves.
  3. Monitor Related Party Exposure: When 100% of your assets depend on group companies, you have no independent financial health. Diversification of debtor base is essential.
  4. Early Intervention: The equity collapse between 2022-2023 should have triggered immediate review and corrective action.

Prognosis

Posthumous – The company is dissolved. No future financial outlook exists.

The trajectory from a property-holding company with £67,422 in equity to a shell with £229 in equity, followed by dissolution, suggests this was a planned wind-down rather than a sudden business failure. The property asset appears to have been deliberately extracted, leaving the company as an empty vessel to be closed.


Perspective: Financial Health Diagnostician · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 31 July 2026