ALIAS (UK) LTD
Company number 06573141 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Financial Health Assessment: ALIAS (UK) LTD
1. Financial Health Score: F
Critical Condition – Company Deceased
This company has been dissolved and exhibited terminal financial decline in its final years. Equity was effectively extinguished, dropping 99.7% from £67,422 to £229 between 2022 and 2023, with no recovery. The patient has passed away.
2. Key Vital Signs
| Vital Sign | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | Trend | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | £57,862 | £77,947 | £118,672 | Declining ⬇️ | ⚠️ Critical |
| Total Liabilities | £57,633 | £77,718 | £51,250 | Volatile | ⚠️ Concerning |
| Shareholders' Funds | £229 | £229 | £67,422 | Collapsed ⬇️ | ☠️ Terminal |
| Cash | £63 | £162 | £115 | Depleted ⬇️ | ☠️ Terminal |
| Net Current Assets | £229 | £229 | £67,422 | Collapsed ⬇️ | ☠️ Terminal |
| Current Ratio | 1.004 | 1.006 | 2.32 | Deteriorated ⬇️ | ⚠️ Critical |
Cash – The Pulse Rate
Cash of £63 represents a near-flatline pulse. This company has essentially zero liquidity to meet obligations, fund operations, or respond to any financial shock. A healthy business maintains cash reserves as a buffer; this company had none.
Equity – The Immune System
Shareholders' funds of £229 on total assets of £57,862 gives a equity ratio of just 0.4%. This means 99.6% of the company's assets were financed by liabilities. The financial immune system was completely compromised – any write-off or bad debt would have pushed the company into negative net assets (technical insolvency).
Inter-company Dependencies – The Parasitic Relationship
The balance sheet reveals an unhealthy dependency on group structures: - 100% of debtors (£57,799) are amounts owed by group undertakings - £115 owed to group undertakings as creditors - £57,518 in "other creditors" – likely director loans or related party funding
The company was essentially a conduit within a group structure, with virtually no independent trading substance.
3. Diagnosis
Cause of Death: Extreme Equity Haemorrhage and Cash Starvation
The financial post-mortem reveals a clear sequence of decline:
Phase 1 – Stability (2015-2022): The company maintained reasonable health through this period, with shareholders' funds growing from £27,328 (2015) to £67,422 (2022). Total assets remained in the £116k-£119k range. The company appeared to hold investment property (consistent with SIC code 68100 – buying and selling of own real estate).
Phase 2 – Acute Decline (2022-2023): Something catastrophic occurred between March 2022 and March 2023: - Shareholders' funds collapsed from £67,422 to £229 (a loss of £67,193) - Total assets fell from £118,672 to £77,947 (a reduction of £40,725) - Total liabilities increased from £51,250 to £77,718 (a rise of £26,468) - The property asset appears to have been removed from the balance sheet
The most likely explanation: The company's investment property was transferred out of the company (likely to a group entity or related party), while the associated liability or director loan remained. This stripped the company of its primary asset while leaving obligations in place.
Phase 3 – Terminal Stasis (2023-2024): The company existed in a zombie state – technically alive but with no meaningful activity. Assets and liabilities both reduced in tandem (group debtor being repaid, other creditors being repaid), leaving the same wafer-thin £229 equity. Cash continued to bleed out.
Final Outcome: The company was dissolved, with dissolution date recorded as 4 August 2026 (this may represent a planned future dissolution date or a filing anomaly).
Secondary Conditions:
-
No Independent Trading Activity: The company had no trade creditors in 2024 (down from just £446 in 2023), suggesting no active trading with external suppliers.
-
Minimal Share Capital: Only £2 in issued share capital (2 ordinary shares of £1 each), indicating the company was never capitalised with meaningful equity.
-
Group Dependency: The entire asset base was an inter-company debtor. If the group structure failed or the owing entity became insolvent, this company would have had no recourse.
4. Recommendations (Post-Mortem Lessons)
While this company is beyond saving, the case provides important lessons for stakeholders and similar businesses:
For Directors (Robert Smith & Mike Smith):
- Director Loan Accounts: The £57,518 in "other creditors" likely includes director loans. Ensure these were properly dealt with before dissolution – unpaid director loans may still be personally claimable.
- Group Reconciliation: Verify that all inter-company balances (£57,799 owed by group undertakings) were properly settled or written off before dissolution.
- Tax Clearance: Ensure Corporation Tax obligations were cleared with HMRC, particularly regarding any property disposal that triggered the 2022-2023 asset reduction.
For Group Entities:
- Related Party Transactions: Any group company that owed £57,799 to this entity should ensure this balance is properly accounted for in its own records following dissolution.
- Asset Transfer Documentation: If property was transferred out, ensure proper documentation exists for tax and legal purposes.
General Business Health Principles (for living companies):
- Maintain Minimum Equity Buffers: A company with 0.4% equity ratio has zero resilience. Healthy businesses should maintain equity ratios above 30-40%.
- Cash Reserves Are Non-Negotiable: £63 in cash provides no buffer whatsoever. Businesses should maintain a minimum of 3-6 months of operating expenses in liquid reserves.
- Monitor Related Party Exposure: When 100% of your assets depend on group companies, you have no independent financial health. Diversification of debtor base is essential.
- Early Intervention: The equity collapse between 2022-2023 should have triggered immediate review and corrective action.
Prognosis
Posthumous – The company is dissolved. No future financial outlook exists.
The trajectory from a property-holding company with £67,422 in equity to a shell with £229 in equity, followed by dissolution, suggests this was a planned wind-down rather than a sudden business failure. The property asset appears to have been deliberately extracted, leaving the company as an empty vessel to be closed.