ARCELORMITTAL AUTO PROCESSING UK LIMITED

LIMITED Company Number: 01236067 Property: Share in respect of Certificate No 107 dated 1st December 1996 being one £1 Preference Share in Steel Training Limited (re- named Metskill Limited) being company number 02465674 Treasury Solicitor: The Solicitor for the Affairs of Her Majesty’s Treasury of PO Box 70165, London WC1A 9HG (DX 123240 Kingsway). 2. In pursuance of the powers granted by s. 1013 of the Companies Act 2006 the Treasury Solicitor as nominee for the Crown (in whom the property and rights of the company vested when the Company was dissolved) hereby disclaims the Crown’s title (if any) in the Property the vesting of the Property having come to his notice on 31 October 2016. Assistant Treasury Solicitor (Section 3 Treasury Solicitor Act 1876) 11 November 2016 NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER OF BONA VACANTIA COMPANIES ACT 2006 Company Name: DUNDONALD ESTATES LIMITED WHEREAS DUNDONALD ESTATES LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Acts under Company number SC265793 was dissolved on 2 May2014; AND WHEREAS in terms of section 1012 of the Companies Act 2006 all property and rights whatsoever vested in or held on trust for a dissolved company immediately before its dissolution are deemed to be bona vacantia; AND WHEREAS immediately before its dissolution the said Dundonald Estates Limited was heritably vest in ALL and WHOLE subjects on the east side of Rench Farm, Drumclog, Strathaven registered in the Land Register of Scotland under Title Number LAN157296; AND WHEREAS the dissolution of the said Dundonald Estates Limited came to my notice on 6 November 2014: Now THEREFORE I, DAVID BRYCE HARVIE, the Queen’s and Lord Treasurer’s Remembrancer, in pursuance of section 1013 of the Companies Act 2006, do by this Notice disclaim the Crown’s whole right and title in and to the aforesaid heritable property. David Harvie Queen’s and Lord Treasurer’s Remembrancer 25 Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1LA 15 November 2016 NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER OF BONA VACANTIA COMPANIES ACT 2006 Company Name: TEMPLETON FORREST LTD WHEREAS TEMPLETON FORREST LTD, a company incorporated under the Companies Acts under Company number SC477226 was dissolved on 5 July 2016; AND WHEREAS in terms of section 1012 of the Companies Act 2006 all property and rights whatsoever vested in or held on trust for a dissolved company immediately before its dissolution are deemed to be bona vacantia; AND WHEREAS immediately before its dissolution the said Templeton Forrest Ltd was the Tenant under a Lease between Lunar Retail S.A.R.L and the said Templeton Forrest Ltd (therein referred to as Templeton Forrest Limited) dated 31 August and 17 September and registered in the Books of Council and Session on 19 October all in the year 2015 of ALL and WHOLE the premises known as and forming Unit 3, Quadrant Shopping Centre, 125 Main Street, Coatbridge (the Landlord’s interest in inter alia which premises is registered in the Land Register of Scotland under Title Number LAN77119); AND WHEREAS the dissolution of the said Templeton Forrest Ltd first came to my notice on 17 October 2016: Now THEREFORE I, DAVID BRYCE HARVIE, the Queen’s and Lord Treasurer’s Remembrancer, in pursuance of section 1013 of the Companies Act 2006, do by this Notice disclaim the Crown’s whole right and title in and to the Tenant’s interest under the said Lease. David Harvie Queen’s and Lord Treasurer’s Remembrancer 25 Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1LA 15 November 2016 LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM (LYTTON HOUSING ESTATE) (OFF STREET CAR PARK) ORDER 2016 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham made the above Order under sections 6, 32, 35 and 124 of and Part I to IV of schedule 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended. 2. The general effect of the Orders will be to enable the parking places and restrictions on waiting by vehicles (yellow lines) on the Lytton Housing Estate to be enforced under the provisions of the Traffic Management Act 2004. This means that Penalty Charge Notices can be issued by the Council’s Civil Enforcement Officers to vehicles that contravene the parking restrictions, and vehicles may be removed (towed away) or immobilised (clamped) in certain cases, in the same way as on the public highway. The same rights of appeal to an adjudicator would also apply. 3. The parking restrictions on the Lytton Housing Estate will operate as follows: (a) the parking restrictions to operate Monday to Saturday 9am – 8.30pm; (b) every vehicle must be parked wholly within a marked parking bay (vehicles are not permitted to park in any other areas on the estate, including footways); ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE (c) parking permits to be issued in accordance with on street parking permit charges as set by the Council in respect of motor vehicles that is to say a passenger vehicle or goods carrying vehicle the overall height of which does not exceed 2.28 metres. (d) only vehicles displaying a valid resident’s parking permit or a valid contractor’s parking permit or an activated Controlled Parking Zone E SMART Visitor permit would be permitted to park in a permit holders parking bay; (f) resident’s parking permits and Controlled Parking Zone E SMART visitor’s parking permits to be issued only to eligible residents of the Lytton Housing Estate; (g) resident’s permits would only be issued to residents who can show that their vehicle is registered as kept at their home address on the Lytton Housing Estate; (h) A motorcycle, may be left in a parking bay free of charge, provided the use of that part of the parking place is not closed or reserved by order of the Council; (i) where a parking bay is indicated as being for the use of a disabled person’s vehicle, only a vehicle displaying a disabled person’s blue badge may be left in that parking bay. 4. Any person desiring to question the validity of the Orders or any of the provisions therein on the grounds that it is not within the powers of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 or that any of the relevant requirements thereof or of any regulations made thereunder, may, within 6 weeks of the Orders being made, make application for the purpose to the High Court. Transport and Highways Group, Highways and Engineering Division, Environment Department, Town Hall Extension, King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9JU. Dated this 16th day of October 2016 Nicholas Ruxton-Boyle Chief Transport Planner Transport and Highways THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL ROADS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1984 The City of Edinburgh Council proposes to make an Order under Section 1(1) and 152(2) of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 redetermining the roads described in the schedule hereto The title of the Order is The City of Edinburgh Council (Calder Road and Sighthill Court, Edinburgh) (Redetermination of Means of Exercise of Public Right of Passage) Order 201_ RSO/16/15 A copy of the proposed Order and of the accompanying plan showing the road to be stopped up, together with a statement of the reasons for making the Order have been deposited at The City of Edinburgh Council, City Chambers Reception, High St, Edinburgh or online at www.edinburgh.gov.uk/trafficorders or www.tellmescotland.gov.uk Those documents are available for inspection free of charge from 22/11/16 until 20/12/16 between 09:30 and 15:30 Mon to Fri inclusive. Any person may, within 28 days from 22/11/16 object to the making of the Order by notice, in writing, or e-mail [email protected] quoting reference RSO/16/15 to THE HEAD OF TRANSPORT AND PLANNING, PLACE, CITY CHAMBERS, HIGH ST, EDINBURGH, EH1 1YJ. Objections should state the name and address of the objector, the matters to which they relate and the grounds on which they are made. Dated 22/11/16 Paul Lawrence Executive Director of Place ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM FOOTWAY TO CYCLE TRACK Sighthill Court (East Side) All that part of the footway on the east side of Sighthill Court from a point 4.5 m or thereby south of the intersection of the extended north kerbline of the access road to Blenheim House Nursing Home and the east kerbline of Sighthill Court southwards, for a distance of 16 m or thereby and which has a width throughout 3 m or thereby. Sighthill Court (West Side) and Calder Road, North Carriageway (North Side) All that part of the footway on the west side of Sighthill Court and the north side of Calder Rd, North Carriageway, from the intersection of the south kerbline of the access road to Blenheim House Nursing Home and the rear of the west footway of Sighthill Court a) southwards, for a distance of 5 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 0 m or thereby to 3 m or thereby, and then b)southwards and then westwards, along the rear of the west footway on Sighthill Court and the rear of the north footway on Calder Rd, North Carriageway, to a point 25 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the extended rear of the north footway of Calder Rd, North Carriageway and which has a width throughout 3 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM VERGE TO CYCLE TRACK Calder Rd, North Carriageway (North Side) All that part of the verge on the north side of Calder Rd from a point 13 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the extended southern line of the north footway on Calder Rd westwards, a) for a distance of 3 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 0 m or thereby to 4 m or thereby, and then b) for a distance of 6 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 4 m or thereby to 4.5 m or thereby. Calder Rd (Central Reserve) All that part of the verge on the central reserve of Calder Rd from a point 14 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the north carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 16 m or thereby and which has a width throughout of 3 m or thereby. Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the verge on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 21 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 9 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 3 m or thereby to 5.5 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM CARRIAGEWAY TO VERGE Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the carriageway on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 9 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 12 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 0 m or thereby to 2 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM CARRIAGEWAY TO CYCLE TRACK Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the carriageway on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 21 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 9 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 2 m or thereby to 3 m or thereby and then to 2.5 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM CARRIAGEWAY TO FOOTWAY Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the carriageway on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 30 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 9 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 2.5 m or thereby to 0 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM VERGE TO CARRIAGEWAY Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the verge on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 37 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, a) for a distance of 8 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 0 m or thereby to 1 metre or thereby, and then b) for a distance of 5 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 1 metre or thereby to 0 m or thereby. All that part of the verge on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 59 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, for a distance of 5 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 0 m or thereby to 1 metre or thereby, and then to 0 m or thereby. ROAD OVER WHICH MEANS OF EXERCISE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF PASSAGE IS TO BE REDETERMINED FROM VERGE TO FOOTWAY Calder Rd, South Carriageway (South Side) All that part of the verge on the south side of Calder Rd, South Carriageway, from a point 46 m or thereby west of the intersection of the extended west kerbline of ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Sighthill Court and the south kerbline of the south carriageway of Calder Rd westwards, a)for a distance of 13 m or thereby and which has a width throughout of 3 metre or thereby, and then b) for a distance of 3 m or thereby and which has a width that varies from 3 m or thereby to 0 m or thereby. TRANSPORT FOR LONDON ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE A3211 GLA ROAD (VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, CITY OF LONDON) (TEMPORARY PROHIBITION OF TRAFFIC) ORDER 1. Transport for London having consulted the City of London hereby gives notice that it intends to make the above named Traffic Order under section 14(1), (5), (7) and 15(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and is satisfied that these works will last in excess of 18 months for the purpose specified in paragraph 2. The effect of the Order is summarised in paragraph 3. 2. The purpose of the Order is to enable Thames Tideway construction works to take place at A3211 Victoria Embankment. 3. The effect of the Order will be to prohibit any: (1) vehicle from entering, exiting or proceeding on the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street; (2) vehicle from entering, exiting or proceeding or in the gap in the teardrop traffic island separating the northbound and southbound carriageways of the A201 New Bridge Street situated between a point 4 metres north of the extended northern kerb-line of Blackfriars passage and a point opposite the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street; (3) vehicle from entering, exiting or proceeding on bi-directional cycle track on the A3211 Victoria Embankment southern slip road and the southern side of the A3211 Victoria Embankment between its junction with the A201 New Bridge Street and a point opposite the extended eastern kerb-line of Temple Avenue; (4) vehicle, except pedal cycles, from entering, exiting, proceeding or stopping on the temporary bi-directional cycle track at the northern side of the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street between its junctions with the A201 New Bridge Street and the extended eastern kerb-line of Temple Avenue; (5) any pedal cycle proceeding in an easterly direction on the temporary bi-directional cycle track at the northern side of the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street between its junctions with the A201 New Bridge Street and the extended eastern kerb-line of Temple Avenue upon reaching its junction with New Bridge Street from proceeding in any direction except left onto the bi-directional cycle track on the A201New Bridge Street towards Ludgate Hill or right onto the bi-directional cycle track on the A201 New Bridge Street towards Blackfriars Bridge; (6) vehicle from proceeding in any direction other than eastwards on the main traffic carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street; (7) pedestrian from entering, exiting or proceeding on the footway at the southern side of the A3211 Victoria Embankment southern slip road and the A3211 Victoria Embankment between its junction with the A201 New Bridge Street and a point opposite the extended eastern kerb-line of Temple Avenue. The Order also: (8) permits pedal cycles to turn left or right from the bi-directional cycle track at the western side of the A201 New Bridge Street into the temporary bi-directional cycle track at the northern side of the A3211 Victoria Embankment northern slip-road connecting the eastbound carriageway of the A3211 Victoria Embankment with the A201 New Bridge Street; (9) suspends the one way operation on Carmelite Street between its junctions with Tallis Street and the Victoria Embankment northern slip road permitting two way operation. The Order will be effective at certain times from 12:01 AM on 2nd January 2017 until the works have been completed. The prohibition will apply only during such times and to such extent as shall from time to time be indicated by traffic signs. 4. The prohibitions will not apply in respect of: (1) any vehicle being used for the purposes of those works or for fire brigade, ambulance or police purposes; (2) anything done with the permission or at the direction of a police constable in uniform or a person authorised by Transport for London. 5. At such times as the prohibition is in force an alternative route will be indicated by traffic signs via (for when the northern slip-road is one way eastbound or closed) (for southbound traffic on New Bridge Street) Fleet Street, Strand, Arundel Street and Temple Place to normal route of travel, (for northbound traffic on Blackfriars Road) Stamford Street, Waterloo Road, Waterloo Bridge, Lancaster Place, Aldwych. Arundel Place and Temple Place to normal route of travel, or Stamford Street, York Road, Westminster Bridge Road, Westminster Bridge, Victoria Embankment, and Temple Place to normal route of travel, (when the slip road is closed) (for eastbound traffic on Victoria Embankment) (when the slip road is closed) Blackfriars Underpass, Puddle Dock and Queen Victoria Street to normal route of travel. (for traffic on Carmelite Street) Tallis Street, John Carpenter Street, Tudor Street, New Bridge Street, Fleet Street, Strand, Arundel Street and Temple Place to normal route of travel (for the closure of the southern slip-road ) (for cycles) use the northern slip road to normal route of travel, (for pedestrians) the pedestrian crossing to the eastern footway of New Bridge Street, to the pedestrian crossing north of Blackfriars Passage to the westbound footway of New Bridge Street, the footway on the northern slip-road and the pedestrian crossing to the southern footway of Victoria Embankment adjacent to Temple Place to normal route of travel. 6. The Order will be revoked upon completion of these works. Dated this 22nd day of November 2016 Mufu Durowoju Network Impact Management Team Manager, Road Space Management - Operations, Transport for London Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, London, SE1 8NJ TRANSPORT FOR LONDON ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE GLA ROADS AND GLA SIDE ROADS (WESTMINSTER) RED ROUTE CONSOLIDATION TRAFFIC ORDER 2008 A3211 GLA ROAD (VICTORIA EMBANKMENT) VARIATION ORDER 2016 1. Transport for London hereby gives notice that on 15th November 2016 it made the above named Order, under section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The Order will come into force on 22nd November 2016. 2. The general nature and effect of the Order will be to implement, on the east-side of A3211 Victoria Embankment, the following measures: (1) Install a 20 metre bus pick up and set down only bay opposite the Norman Shaw Building North; (2) Install a 15 metre bus stand for the ‘Big Bus Tour’ opposite the Norman Shaw Building North; (3) Install a 26 metre bus stand for the ‘The Original Tour’ opposite the Norman Shaw Building North; (4) Install a 36 metre Police vehicles only bay opposite Richmond Terrace; (5) shorten the No Stopping At Any Time restriction opposite the Norman Shaw Building North by 4 metres at its northern end; (6) install a 30 metre coach bay opposite Whitehall Police Station; (7) reduce the coach bay opposite Victoria Embankment Gardens by 12 metres at the southern end. 3. The road which would be affected by the Order is A3211 GLA Victoria Embankment. 4. A copy of the Order, a map indicating the location and effect of the Order and copies of any Order revoked, suspended or varied by the Order can be inspected during normal office hours at the offices of: Transport for London Streets Traffic Order Team (RSM/PI/ STOT) Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road London, SE1 8NJ WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff 10th Floor Westminster City Hall 64 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QP 5. Any person wishing to question the validity of the Order or of any of its provisions on the grounds that they are not within the relevant powers conferred by the Act or that any requirement of the Act has not been complied with, that person may, within six weeks from the date on which the Order is made, make application for the purpose to the High Court. Dated this 22nd day of November 2016 Mufu Durowoju ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE Network Impact Management Team - Manager, Road Space Management-Operations, Transport for London TRANSPORT FOR LONDON ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE GLA ROADS AND GLA SIDE ROADS (WESTMINSTER) RED ROUTE CONSOLIDATION TRAFFIC ORDER 2008 VARIATION ORDER (NO.2) 2016 THE GLA ROADS AND GLA SIDE ROADS (ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA) RED ROUTE CONSOLIDATION TRAFFIC ORDER 2008 A3220 GLA ROAD (HOLLAND ROAD) VARIATION ORDER 2016 THE GLA ROAD AND SIDE ROADS (LAMBETH) RED ROUTE CONSOLIDATION TRAFFIC ORDER 2007 A3036 GLA ROAD (ALBERT EMBANKMENT) VARIATION ORDER 2016 THE GLA ROADS AND GLA SIDE ROADS (SOUTHWARK) RED ROUTE CONSOLIDATION TRAFFIC ORDER 2007 A3200 GLA ROAD (SOUTHWARK STREET) VARIATION ORDER 2016 1. Transport for London hereby gives notice that on 15 November 2016 it made the above named Order, under section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The Order will come into force on 23 November 2016. 2. The general nature and effect of the Orders will be to: i. Amend the hours of operation of the bus parking bays: a) Outside No. 60 St John`s Wood Road, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours b) Opposite Nos. 2-42 St John`s Wood Road, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours c) On Park Lane, outside No. 22 Park Lane (Hilton Hotel), from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours d) Outside No. 90 Park Lane, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours e) Outside Inter-Continental Hotel, on Park Lane roundabout, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours f) On Holland Road, at the side of Nos.368-378 Kensington High Street, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours g) Opposite Nos. 18-26 Albert Embankment, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours h) Outside No. 61 Southwark Street, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours i) Outside No.101 Southwark Street, from 20 mins to 1 hour, no return in 2 hours ii. Increase the size of the existing 15 metre Bus Stand opposite Nos. 2 - 42 Lords View by 30 metres north – eastwards. 3. The roads which would be affected by the Orders are A4202 Park Lane, A5205 St John`s Wood Road in the City of Westminster, A3036 Albert Embankment in the London Borough of Lambeth, A3220 Holland Road in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and A3200 in the London Borough of Southwark. 4. A copy of the Order, a statement of Transport for London’s reasons for the proposals, a map indicating the location and effect of the Order and copies of any Order revoked, suspended or varied by the Order can be inspected during normal office hours at the offices of: Transport for London Streets Traffic Order Team (RSM/PI/STOT) Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road London, SE1 8NJ City Commissioner of Transportation City of Westminster, City Hall 11th Floor North West 64 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QP Director for Transport and Highways Transport and Highways Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Room 114, Council Offices 37 Pembroke Road London W8 6PW Director for Transport and Highways Transport and Highways Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Room 114, Council Offices 37 Pembroke Road London W8 6PW Streetworks Officer Southwark Council Third Floor, Hub 1 PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 5. Any person wishing to question the validity of the Order or of any of its provisions on the grounds that they are not within the relevant powers conferred by the Act or that any requirement of the Act has not been complied with, that person may, within six weeks from the date on which the Order is made, make application for the purpose to the High Court. Dated this 22nd day of November 2016 Mufu Durowoju Network Impact Management Team Manager Road Space Management - Operations, Transport for London Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, London, SE1 8NJ OTHER NOTICES OTHER NOTICES DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1566/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff : Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Richard Perfect – SEA TERRA MARİNA B22- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) Above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on January 2010, for these services around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra B22. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) but the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty)STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1562/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Peter Harris – SEA TERRA MARİNA A25- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. OTHER NOTICES Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on September 2007, for these services around 2007-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra A25. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 10 (ten) STG on 8th March 2011, 25 (twenty five) STG on 10th July 2012, 35 (thirty five) STG totally and still owes 4,795 (four thousand seven hundred and ninety five) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 4,795 (four thousand seven hundred and ninety five) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 4,795 (four thousand seven hundred and ninety five) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 4,795 (four thousand seven hundred and ninety five)STG until 10/07/2012 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 25,000 TL – 50,000 TL Case No: 1556/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Carol Roberts –SEA TERRA MARİNA F04&F07- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff around May 2009 for these services around 2010-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly payment for the services he has been receiving for each house via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra estates numbered as F04&F07. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2010-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 25 (twenty five) STG on 6th Febuary 2012 and still owes 7,165 (seven thousand one hundred and sixty five) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 2,970 (two thousand nine hundred and seventy) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 7,165 (seven thousand one hundred and sixty five) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 7,165 (seven thousand one hundred and sixty five) STG until 06/02/2012 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. OTHER NOTICES D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 1,585 (one thousand five hundred and eighty five) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1565/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Jenny Perfect – SEA TERRA MARİNA B01- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on January 2010, for these services around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra B01. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) but the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty)STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL - 25,000 TL Case No: 1567/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: David Perfect –SEA TERRA MARİNA B21- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. OTHER NOTICES Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff around January 2010 for these services around 2010-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly payment for the services he has been receiving for each house via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra estate numbered as B21. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) bur the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1568/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Anita Ellis – SEA TERRA MARİNA B15- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on January 2009, for these services around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra B15. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) but the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty)STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. OTHER NOTICES D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1561/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Lee Hall – SEA TERRA MARİNA B15- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on January 2009, for these services around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra B15. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) but the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty)STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 2000 TL – 5000 TL Case No: 1558/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Gary Rosson, Sea Terra Marina, C25, Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. OTHER NOTICES Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff for these services around 2010-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, totally 540 (five hundred and forty) STG per year, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG monthly and totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra estate numbered as C25. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2010-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 65 (sixty five) STG on 21st June 2013 and still owes 3,525 (three thousand five hundred and twenty five) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,525 (three thousand five hundred and twenty five) and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons,the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,525 (three thousand five hundred and twenty five) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,525 (three thousand five hundred and twenty five) STG until 11/1/2016 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1555/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Charlotte Leniston – SEA TERRA MARİNA B14- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on March 2007, for these services around 2007-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, totally 540 (five hundred and forty) STG per year, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG monthly and totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, aroun 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2007-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 138 (one hundred and thirty eight) STG on 13th April 2011 and still owes 4,982 (four thousand nine hundred and eighty two) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 4,982 (four thousand nine hundred and eighty two) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 4,982 (four thousand nine hundred and eighty two) STG to the plaintiff. OTHER NOTICES B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 4,982 (four thousand nine hundred and eighty two) STG until 13/04/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 1,585 (one thousand five hundred and eighty five) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1563/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Paul Cooper –SEA TERRA MARİNA D07- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff around January 2010 for these services around 2010-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, totally 540 (five hundred and forty) STG per year, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG monthly and totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra estate numbered as D07. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 80 (eighty) STG on 7th July 2014 and still owes 2,970 (two thousand nine hundred and seventy) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 2,970 (two thousand nine hundred and seventy) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 2,970 (two thousand nine hundred and seventy) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 2,970 (two thousand nine hundred and seventy)STG until 07/07/2014 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. COMPANY LAW SUPPLEMENT The Company Law Supplement details information notified to, or by, the Registrar of Companies. The Company Law Supplement to The London, Belfast and Edinburgh Gazette is published weekly on a Tuesday. These supplements are available to view at https:// www.thegazette.co.uk/browse-publications. Alternatively use the search and filter feature which can be found here https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices on the company number and/or name. DEVON & CORNWALL POLICE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF CASH WITHOUT COURT ORDER UNDER SECTION 297 PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT 2002 To: Pawel Chuchra and Daria Zakrzewska of No Fixed Abode. Date: 17th November 2016 Pursuant to Section 297 of Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as Amended by Section 65 PCA 2009, notice is hereby given as per Section 297(B) that cash namely £ 5,1550.00 which was recovered on 20th May 2016 from Pawel Chuchra and Daria Daria Zakrzewska, travelling in Audi A6 motorcar OU13ZDA on the M5 Motorway near Exeter Devon under Section 295 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at Exeter Magistrates Court on the 18th August 2016. A Notice of Forfeiture of Cash without Court Order Under Section 297 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 has been issued by a Senior Officer as per Section 297A(2) on Thursday 17th November 2016. Any person may object to the proposed Forfeiture by Friday 23rd December 2016 in writing to: DC 4393 POPE, Devon and Cornwall Police Serious and Organised Crime Investigation Team, P.O.Box 770 Exeter EX1 9TN Unless an objection is received by this date the £ 5,155.00 will be forfeited. OTHER NOTICES DM: Between 10,000 TL – 25,000 TL Case No: 1570/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Lewis Perfect – SEA TERRA MARİNA B02- Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on January 2010, for these services around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra B22. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2011-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) but the defendant has no payment. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 3,050 (three thousand and fifty) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 3,050 (three thousand and fifty)STG until 01/01/2011 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 756 (seven hundred and fifty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. DM: Between 5,000 TL- 10,000 TL Case No: 1557/2016 FAMAGUSTA DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff: Vistamar Management LTD (MŞ: 11962) via authorised agent and delegate Ahmet Rızalar, Yalı Neighborhood, No: 67, Çiftlikler Street, Metran Plaza, Shop 2, Tatlısu. And Defendant: Justin Lewis, Sea Terra Marina, F10, Tatlısu, Famagusta. Between. Defendant (b) above side. Within 10 days, from the date that this subpoena is delivered to your side, (a) In the case that is filed by the plaintiff given the name below, it is ordered to appear on person. Demand of plaintiff on this case has been identified in the particular of the case behind this document. Notification adress of plaintiff is (d) Adv. Ozge Bengusu c/o Gamze Kocaturk Bureau, Famagusta. Be sure that, if you neglect to appear in person as it is investitured below, plaintiff have the right to forward case in your abstence and receive a judgement. This is recorded and stamped with a seal on 22th of April 2016. Registrar. Advocate Özge Bengüsu (g) Counsel for the Plaintiff WARNING: (1)Via appear in person or via an advocate (g) at Famagusta. It is possible to give registrar an appear in person serfiticate and deliver a copy of this serfiticate to plaintiff’s notification, which is stamped and signed by the registrar. (2) If defendant misfeasance to give his defence 14 days after than the expire date given for appear in person, an adversely judgement can be filed, if any subpoena includes the judgement will not be delivered. Give the direct adress including the street name and the number of house. If any surmised, denominate concern of defendant. Denominate the inland town and village that the court will hear the case. Indicate the denominate of claimant. Date is going to be filled by registrar. If it is litigated personally, scratch out the words ‘to be represented by’ Any adress that is going to be disclose document given in (d) to the claimant and anybodies adress which is located in the village or town’s municipal boundaries which registrar that the case is embroided. NOTICE: - within the restitution of subpoena, it is obeyed to arbitrament number 2 and arbitrement of describtion of postulation. CLAIMS OTHER NOTICES 1. The plaintiff is a registered limited company in the TRNC Companies House with the No. of MS 11962 at all times relevant to this case and is a legal entity. The plaintiff provides service to the residental site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has commenced this case with this title. 2. The defendant, at all times relevant to this case, is a resident in the site called SEA TERRA MARINA and has received and/or accepted and/or requested the services of the plaintiff. 3. The plaintiff has taken the responsibility of the maintance, management, cleaning etc (further details will be give at time of hearing) of the site known as Sea Terra Marina at around 2007 and has been doing since then and the defendant has been benefitting from this services. 4. The defendant has made an verbal and/or written agreement (and/or agreement resulting them as the acts of parties) with the contractor company and/or the plaintiff on around January 2010, for these services around 2010-2011 45 (forty five) STG monthly, totally 540 (five hundred and forty) STG per year, around 2011-2015 50 (fifty) STG totally 600 (six hundred) STG per year, around 2015-2016 54,17 (fifty four point seventeen) STG monthly, totally 650 (six hundred and fifty) STG payment for the services he has been receiving via this agreement and/or being the landlord and/or being the occupant of Sea Terra F10. 5. The defendant currently is in debt to the plaintiff for the period of 2010-2016 and this debt has been matured. 6. The plaintiff has asked for the payments of the above mentioned monies many times (verbal and/or written) and the defendant has only paid 35 (thirty five) STG on 14th December 2013 and 1,200 (one thousand and two hundred) STG on 21th September 2015, still owes 2,355 (two thousand three hundred and fifty five) STG for the plaintiff. 7. The plaintiff is still in charge of the maintenance on the said site. 8. The damage of the plaintiff because of unpaid services is 1,200 (one thousand and two hundred) STG and its interests from the mature dates. 9. In the light of above reasons, the plaintiff requests; A. A court order and/or judgement providing defendant to pay 1,200 (one thousand and two hundred) STG to the plaintiff. B. A court order including defendant to pay annual legal interest upon amount of 1,200 (one thousand and two hundred) STG until 21/09/2015 to completely disbursement date. C. Any other state and/or remedy that the court will see fit and fair. D. Litigation costs and interest payment of 14% and 16% VAT through litigation to be paid. P.S: If the amount above will be paid the summons together with interest and legal costs which is 566 (five hundred and sixty six) TL and 16% VAT summons within 10 days from notification to plaintiff’s attorney, this case will not be taken further. Özge Bengusu Plaintiff’s Attorney Appropriate to the Original Registrar. COMPANY LAW SUPPLEMENT The Company Law Supplement details information notified to, or by, the Registrar of Companies. The Company Law Supplement to The London, Belfast and Edinburgh Gazette is published weekly on a Tuesday. These supplements are available to view at https:// www.thegazette.co.uk/browse-publications. Alternatively use the search and filter feature which can be found here https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices on the company number and/or name. MONEY PENSIONS MONEY BEELEY FABRICATIONS LIMITED RETIREMENT & DEATH BENEFITS SCHEME - E30108 PURSUANT TO SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEES ACT 1925 Beeley Fabrications Limited Retirement & Death Benefits Scheme (“The Scheme”) was established with effect from 1 December 1986. Beeley Fabrications Limited went into Liquidation on 3 March 2016. Clumber Consultancy Limited of Registered Office, Edwinstowe House, High Street, Edwinstowe, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG21 9PR, were appointed by the Liquidator in their capacity as Trustee to the Scheme. The Trustees have corresponded by post with all known members of the Scheme. Accordingly, it is of vital importance that any person having a claim against or an interest in the Scheme, including any person who may have been employed by the company or an associated employer on a part time basis and who considers that his or her conclusion from the Scheme may have constituted indirect discrimination, who has not received correspondence from us should make themselves known to Clumber Consultancy Limited. Particulars of any claim should be sent in writing to the under- mentioned contact on or before 21 January 2017 after which date the Trustees will proceed with the winding up of the Scheme and distribution of the scheme assets having regard only to the claims and interests of which it has had notice. Notification is not required from persons who are currently in receipt of a pension from the Scheme, or who have received correspondence relating to the Scheme from the Trustees. Denise van Gellecum, Clumber Consultancy Limited, Edwinstowe House, High Street, Edwinstowe, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG21 9PR. CLAXTON BUND COMPANY LIMITED RETIREMENT BENEFIT SCHEME PURSUANT TO SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEES ACT 1925 Claxton Blind Company Limited Retirement Benefit Scheme (“The Scheme”) was established with effect from 1 November 1988. Claxton Blind Company Limited went into Administration on 19 February 2016. Clumber Consultancy Limited of Registered Office, Edwinstowe House, High Street, Edwinstowe, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG21 9PR, were appointed by the Administrator in their capacity as Trustee to the Scheme. The Trustees have corresponded by post with all known members of the Scheme. Accordingly, it is of vital importance that any person having a claim against or an interest in the Scheme, including any person who may have been employed by the company or an associated employer on a part time basis and who considers that his or her conclusion from the Scheme may have constituted indirect discrimination, who has not received correspondence from us should make themselves known to Clumber Consultancy Limited. Particulars of any claim should be sent in writing to the under- mentioned contact on or before 21 January 2017 after which date the Trustees will proceed with the winding up of the Scheme and distribution of the scheme assets having regard only to the claims and interests of which it has had notice. Notification is not required from persons who are currently in receipt of a pension from the Scheme, or who have received correspondence relating to the Scheme from the Trustees. Denise van Gellecum, Clumber Consultancy Limited, Edwinstowe House, High Street, Edwinstowe, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG21 9PR. Corporate insolvency NOTICES OF DIVIDENDS