BLUEBELL CONSERVATORIES LIMITED

Company number 06627463 ·

Active - Proposal to Strike off

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Financial Health Assessment: BLUEBELL CONSERVATORIES LIMITED

1. Financial Health Score: F (Critical Condition)

This business is in a state of severe financial distress, presenting with chronic insolvency that has persisted for nearly a decade. The patient is, in medical terms, on life support — and the registrar has already issued the equivalent of a "do not resuscitate" order through the active proposal to strike off.


2. Key Vital Signs

Vital Sign Reading Interpretation
Net Assets £(58,098) Critical — Deeply insolvent; liabilities exceed assets by £58k
Net Current Liabilities £(43,395) Critical — No working capital; unable to cover short-term debts
Current Liabilities £47,197 Elevated and worsening — Jumped 55% from £30,421 in 2023
Cash £300 (est.) Dangerously low — Essentially no liquidity buffer
Fixed Assets £7,455 Declining — Down from £9,318; asset base eroding
Shareholders' Funds £(58,098) Critical — Deeply negative equity; retained losses accumulating
Employees 3 (down from 4) Contracting — Workforce shrinking

3. Diagnosis

Chronic Insolvency — Terminal Without Intervention

The financial data reveals a business that has been technically insolvent for virtually its entire existence. Looking at the longitudinal health record:

  • 2015: Net assets £(61,331)
  • 2016: Net assets £(67,451) — worsening
  • 2017: Net assets £(81,009) — worsening
  • 2018: Net assets £(90,683) — worsening
  • 2019: Net assets £(96,026) — worst point
  • 2020: Net assets £(87,604) — slight improvement
  • 2021: Net assets £114,907 — apparent anomaly, likely capital restructure
  • 2022: Net assets £(58,884) — back to insolvency
  • 2023: Net assets £(43,575) — brief improvement
  • 2024: Net assets £(58,098) — deterioration resumes

The 2021 "recovery" to positive net assets appears to have been a temporary intervention — akin to a massive transfusion that masked the underlying disease. By 2022, the patient had relapsed into deep insolvency.

Symptoms of Distress

  1. Current Liabilities Hemorrhaging: Short-term creditors surged from £30,421 to £47,197 in a single year — a 55% increase. This suggests the business is accumulating unpaid obligations it cannot service.

  2. Zero Liquidity: With approximately £300 in cash and £43,395 in net current liabilities, the company has no ability to meet its near-term obligations. This is the financial equivalent of a patient with no pulse — cash is not circulating.

  3. Asset Erosion: Total assets declined from £13,971 to £11,257, while fixed assets dropped from £9,318 to £7,455. The business is consuming its own capital to survive.

  4. Director Exposure: With only one active director (Ellymay Simpson) and the company trading while insolvent, there are serious legal risks under the Insolvency Act 1986. A director who continues trading when they knew, or ought to have known, there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation may face personal liability for wrongful trading.

  5. Strike-Off Proceedings: The status "Active — Proposal to Strike off" indicates that either the company or a third party has initiated dissolution. This is often triggered by failure to file documents or at the company's own request to wind down.

  6. Overdue Accounts: The company has overdue filing obligations, suggesting administrative neglect or an inability to meet even basic compliance requirements.

Secondary Conditions

  • PSC Discrepancy: Two persons with significant control are listed (Miss Ellymay Simpson with 75%+ and Mr Richard Woodruff with 25-50%), yet only one director is active. This governance gap raises questions about oversight and decision-making.
  • Registered Address Mismatch: The Companies House registered address (Warsop, Mansfield) differs from the accounts registered office (Killamarsh, Sheffield), suggesting operational disorganization or recent relocation without proper updates.

4. Prognosis

Poor — Terminal Decline Expected

Without significant intervention, this company will almost certainly be dissolved through the strike-off process or face forced liquidation by creditors. The trajectory is unmistakably downward:

  • The underlying business model appears unable to generate sufficient profitability to service its debts
  • Each year of continued operation adds to accumulated losses
  • Creditors are growing, not shrinking
  • The director appears to be winding down operations rather than restructuring

The brief improvement in 2023 (net assets improving from £-58,884 to £-43,575) has proven to be a false recovery — the 2024 figures show deterioration back to £-58,098.


5. Recommendations

Immediate Actions (Urgent — Within Days)

  1. Seek Insolvency Advice Immediately: The sole director must consult a licensed insolvency practitioner. Trading while insolvent without seeking professional advice increases personal liability exposure daily.

  2. Address Strike-Off Proceedings: Determine whether the strike-off was initiated intentionally. If not, file the necessary documents to contest it — failure to act will result in involuntary dissolution.

  3. File Overdue Accounts: Bring all Companies House filings up to date immediately to avoid escalating penalties and potential criminal prosecution.

Medium-Term Actions (If Business Continuation Is Desired)

  1. Capital Injection or Debt Restructuring: The only path to recovery would require either a significant capital injection (minimum £60,000+ to clear net liabilities) or a formal arrangement with creditors (e.g., Company Voluntary Arrangement).

  2. Creditor Communication: If creditors have not yet taken action, proactive engagement may buy time — but this must be done through proper insolvency channels.

  3. Assess Viability Honestly: With only 3 employees, minimal assets, and a construction industry SIC code, the business must realistically evaluate whether it can generate sufficient revenue to trade out of this position.

If Closure Is the Intended Path

  1. Voluntary Liquidation Over Strike-Off: A Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) administered by a licensed insolvency practitioner is more appropriate than a strike-off when there are significant outstanding creditors. A simple strike-off does not extinguish creditor claims and can be challenged.

  2. Director Duties: The director must prioritize creditor interests over shareholder interests once insolvency is established. Continuing to trade and incur further debts without reasonable prospect of repayment could constitute wrongful trading.


Risk Assessment Summary

Risk Category Level Notes
Insolvency Risk 🔴 Critical Net liabilities of £58k+
Director Personal Liability 🔴 Critical Wrongful trading exposure
Regulatory Compliance 🔴 Critical Overdue accounts; strike-off active
Creditor Action Risk 🟠 High £47k due within one year
Operational Viability 🔴 Critical No cash, declining revenue indicators

Perspective: Financial Health Diagnostician · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 28 August 2026