CENTRAL BRIDGING LOANS LIMITED
Company number 07728274 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Credit Analysis: CENTRAL BRIDGING LOANS LIMITED
1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE
Reasoning: This application must be declined on multiple fundamental grounds. The company is currently filing as dormant with explicit confirmation it has never traded during the most recent accounting periods. A dormant entity generates no revenue and has no operating cash flow to service debt obligations. Additionally, the financial history reveals extreme volatility with negative equity in multiple recent years, and there is a significant discrepancy between the company's website claiming active lending operations and the statutory filings confirming dormancy. This misrepresentation raises serious concerns about management integrity and the reliability of any information provided.
2. Financial Strength: CRITICAL WEAKNESS
The balance sheet trajectory is deeply concerning:
| Year | Net Assets/(Liabilities) | Cash | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | £2,423,095 | £2,023,491 | Positive |
| 2021 | (£610,959) | £439,942 | Negative equity |
| 2022 | (£608,038) | £248,566 | Negative equity |
| 2023 | £100,000 | — | Dormant |
| 2024 | £100,000 | — | Dormant |
Key observations: - The company experienced a catastrophic erosion of equity between 2020-2021, moving from £2.4M positive net assets to over £600K negative equity - The 2024 balance sheet shows only £100,000 in called-up share capital with no other assets or liabilities — this is a shell structure - The dramatic swing from £18M total assets (2018) to a dormant entity with £100K share capital suggests either significant asset disposals, write-offs, or a fundamental restructuring that has stripped the business of operating capacity - Historical leverage was extreme: in 2019, liabilities exceeded £16.8M against minimal equity, indicating the business model relied heavily on debt funding that appears to have been withdrawn
3. Cash Flow Assessment: NON-EXISTENT
Current Position: - The company is dormant — by definition, there is no operating cash flow - No revenue streams are being generated - The only balance sheet item is unpaid share capital (£100,000), meaning even the stated equity is not cash-backed - Cash position deteriorated from £2M+ (2020) to £248K (2022) before the entity became dormant
Working Capital: Not applicable — the company has no current assets or current liabilities in its dormant state.
Debt Service Capacity: Zero. A dormant company cannot service any new debt obligations.
4. Monitoring Points
If this entity ever reactivates or applies in the future, the following require scrutiny:
-
Verify actual trading status: The website (centralbridging.co.uk) claims the company is "an established and highly experienced direct to Borrower Real Estate Lender" — this directly contradicts the dormant filing and "EntityHasNeverTraded" declaration. Determine whether lending is being conducted through a different legal entity.
-
Explain historical financial volatility: The swing from £2.4M net assets to (£610K) and back to £100K requires full explanation. Were loan books written off? Was there a capital reconstruction?
-
Confirm the fate of the lending book: The 2018-2019 balance sheets suggest a substantial lending portfolio. Clarify whether this was sold, written off, or transferred.
-
Related party transactions: Given the PSC structure (Lisa and John Paul Clifford), investigate whether business has been diverted to connected entities.
-
Director conduct: No disqualification records found, but the Clifford family should be screened across all directorships to understand the broader group structure.
-
Filing compliance: Current filings are up to date, but the dramatic shift to dormant status warrants verification that this classification is appropriate given the website's claims.
Risk Summary: This entity presents an unacceptable credit risk. The dormant status eliminates any capacity to service debt, the financial history demonstrates extreme instability, and the discrepancy between the website's active lending claims and statutory dormant filings raises material concerns about the reliability of management representations. Any lending activity bearing this company's name is likely being conducted through an alternative vehicle, which should be identified and assessed separately.