COLOUR IT IN LIMITED
Company number 07004523 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Financial Health Assessment: COLOUR IT IN LIMITED
1. Financial Health Score: F
Grade Justification: The company has been technically insolvent for at least seven consecutive years, with liabilities consistently exceeding assets by over £25,000. The condition is not only chronic but actively worsening—net liabilities increased by approximately £1,715 in the latest year, and current liabilities surged by over £4,200. This represents a patient in persistent critical condition with deteriorating vital signs.
2. Key Vital Signs
| Vital Sign | 2025 | 2024 | Trend | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | £11,459 | £13,745 | ▼ Declining | Asset base shrinking—company is "losing weight" |
| Total Liabilities | £42,633 | £38,404 | ▲ Increasing | Debts growing—financial "blood pressure" rising dangerously |
| Net Assets | (£33,574) | (£31,859) | ▼ Worsening | Insolvency deepening—the "patient" is in negative equity |
| Current Assets | £7,953 | £10,069 | ▼ Declining | Liquid resources shrinking—cash reserves depleting |
| Creditors < 1 Year | £42,633 | £38,404 | ▲ Increasing | Short-term debts accelerating—immediate pressure mounting |
| Net Current Liabilities | (£34,680) | (£28,335) | ▼ Worsening | Working capital crisis—severe liquidity distress |
| Shareholders' Funds | (£33,574) | (£31,859) | ▼ Worsening | Equity completely eroded—shareholder value is negative |
| Employees | 2 | 3 | ▼ Declining | Workforce contracting—business may be scaling back |
Long-Term Vital Signs Trend (Net Assets History)
| Year | Net Assets | Health Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | £2,113 | ✅ Solvent (barely) |
| 2017 | £15,302 | ✅ Solvent (healthy) |
| 2018 | (£25,466) | ❌ Insolvent—critical event |
| 2019 | (£29,600) | ❌ Insolvent—deteriorating |
| 2020 | (£26,151) | ❌ Insolvent—slight improvement |
| 2021 | (£30,718) | ❌ Insolvent—worsening |
| 2022 | (£33,796) | ❌ Insolvent—worst point |
| 2023 | (£28,827) | ❌ Insolvent—temporary relief |
| 2024 | (£31,859) | ❌ Insolvent—deteriorating |
| 2025 | (£33,574) | ❌ Insolvent—near worst |
3. Diagnosis
Primary Condition: Chronic Insolvency with Acute Deterioration
The financial data reveals a company that has been technically insolvent since approximately 2018—a chronic condition that has persisted for seven consecutive years. The "heart attack" occurred around 2017-2018 when the company went from positive net assets of £15,302 to negative net assets of approximately £25,466 in a single year, suggesting a significant loss or write-off event.
Symptom Analysis
1. Severe Working Capital Deficiency (Net Current Liabilities: £34,680)
The company's current assets (£7,953) are dwarfed by current liabilities (£42,633). This means for every £1 of short-term assets, the company owes approximately £5.36 in short-term debts. This is the financial equivalent of respiratory distress—the business cannot breathe financially because it lacks the liquid resources to meet its immediate obligations.
2. Growing Creditor Burden
Short-term creditors increased by £4,229 (11%) in a single year, from £38,404 to £42,633. This suggests the company is accumulating unpaid bills rather than generating sufficient revenue to service its obligations. Creditors are effectively funding the business operations.
3. Asset Erosion
Total assets declined by £2,286 (16.6%) from £13,745 to £11,459. Current assets fell by £2,116 (21%) from £10,069 to £7,953. This pattern indicates the company is consuming its own muscle mass to survive—selling or using up assets without replacing them.
4. Long-term Debt Restructuring
Creditors due after more than one year decreased from £7,200 to £2,400, suggesting either repayment or reclassification of long-term debts into short-term liabilities. This is concerning because it may indicate creditors demanding earlier payment or debts maturing without refinancing options.
5. Director-Dependent Survival
The company can only continue trading because its directors (Alison and Mark Lancaster) are likely supporting it through director loans or personal guarantees. The PSC register confirms both directors each own 25-50% of shares. The business is essentially on director-provided life support.
6. Revenue Contraction Signal
The reduction in average employees from 3 to 2 suggests either cost-cutting measures or natural attrition without replacement—both indicators of a business that may be contracting rather than growing.
Differential Diagnosis
The pattern is consistent with one or more of the following underlying conditions:
- Persistent Trading Losses: Revenue insufficient to cover operating costs, with losses accumulating in the P&L reserve
- Director-Funded Business: The company may be operating primarily on director loans, which appear as liabilities
- Zombie Company Risk: The business may be only just covering variable costs but unable to service its accumulated debts—a "walking dead" scenario
- Potential Creditor Abuse: Trading whilst insolvent for this prolonged period raises questions about whether directors are fulfilling their fiduciary duties to creditors
4. Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Within 30 Days)
-
Solvency Statement & Director Review - Directors must formally assess whether the company can continue as a going concern - If the company cannot pay its debts as they fall due, directors must consider whether to cease trading to avoid wrongful trading claims under Insolvency Act 1986, s.214
-
Cash Flow Forecasting - Prepare a detailed 13-week cash flow forecast to determine whether the business can meet its immediate obligations - Identify the "burn rate"—how long before current assets are exhausted
-
Creditor Communication - Proactively engage with major creditors to negotiate payment terms - Consider whether informal arrangements or a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) might be appropriate
Short-Term Actions (1-3 Months)
-
Profitability Assessment - Conduct a thorough review of revenue streams and profit margins - Determine whether the core business model is viable or requires fundamental restructuring - As a marketing consultancy and web design agency, assess whether the service offering is priced correctly and targeting profitable market segments
-
Debt Structure Analysis - Identify what proportion of the £42,633 current liabilities represents director loans versus trade creditors and HMRC obligations - Director loans may be subordinated (repaid last) to improve the apparent position with trade creditors - Verify whether any director loans have been written off or are being called in
-
Cost Reduction Programme - Review all overheads for immediate cost-saving opportunities - Consider whether the registered office and operational setup is cost-effective for a micro-entity
Medium-Term Actions (3-12 Months)
-
Capital Injection or Restructuring - If the business is fundamentally viable but over-leveraged, consider a formal capital restructuring - Options include: director capital injection, share premium injection, or debt-for-equity swap with director creditors
-
Strategic Direction Decision - The company must choose between:
- Growth strategy: Invest in winning more profitable clients and increasing revenue
- Managed wind-down: If the business cannot generate sufficient returns, consider an orderly solvent liquidation before creditor pressure forces the issue
-
Compliance Review - Given the micro-entity status and filleted accounts, ensure the company is meeting all statutory obligations - Consider whether the reduced filing requirements are appropriate given the insolvency concerns
Ongoing Monitoring
- Monthly Financial Health Checks
- Implement monthly balance sheet reviews to track whether net liabilities are increasing or decreasing
- Set clear KPIs: target net assets moving toward zero (break-even) as a minimum milestone
- Monitor the current ratio (currently 0.19:1) with a target of reaching at least 0.5:1 within 12 months
Risk Assessment
| Risk Factor | Severity | Likelihood | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forced liquidation by creditors | HIGH | MEDIUM | Business closure, potential personal liability for directors |
| Wrongful trading action | HIGH | MEDIUM | Personal liability for director losses |
| HMRC enforcement action | HIGH | MEDIUM | Asset seizure, business disruption |
| Cash flow crisis | CRITICAL | HIGH | Inability to trade, potential breach of director duties |
| Director fatigue/burnout | MEDIUM | HIGH | Withdrawal of director support, business failure |
Prognosis
Outlook: Poor to Guarded
Without significant intervention, this company faces a high probability of forced cessation within 12-24 months. The financial condition has been deteriorating for seven years, and the latest accounts show acceleration of the decline rather than recovery.
Best Case Scenario (20% probability): Directors inject capital, restructure debts, and return the company to profitability. Net assets improve toward zero within 18 months.
Most Likely Scenario (50% probability): Company continues to trade at a minimal level on director support, with insolvency persisting but not worsening dramatically. The "zombie company" limps on until an external shock forces action.
Worst Case Scenario (30% probability): A major creditor (likely HMRC) takes enforcement action, or directors withdraw support, leading to compulsory liquidation with potential personal liability exposure for the directors.