COMPACTGTL LIMITED
Company number 05808040 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
CREDIT ANALYSIS: COMPACTGTL LIMITED
1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE
Recommendation: DECLINE any credit facility. This company presents unacceptable credit risk due to its formal liquidation status, deeply insolvent balance sheet, and negligible liquidity.
Reasoning: The single most determinative fact is that the company is in liquidation. This means a formal insolvency process has commenced, and the company's affairs are being wound up. Extending credit to a company in liquidation carries near-certain loss given default. Even absent the liquidation status, the financial profile is that of a chronically insolvent business with £150M+ accumulated losses, virtually no cash, and negative working capital.
2. Financial Strength: CRITICAL WEAKNESS
Balance Sheet Analysis (FY 2024):
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | (£2,875,355) | Deeply insolvent |
| Shareholders' Funds | (£150,373,953) | Catastrophic accumulated losses |
| Net Current Assets/Liabilities | (£630,919) | Working capital deficit |
| Cash | £12,119 | Critically depleted |
The balance sheet reveals a company that has consumed approximately £150M in shareholder capital over its 18-year history without achieving commercial viability. The R&D-focused business model (gas-to-liquids technology) has not translated into revenue-generating operations sufficient to sustain the enterprise.
Trajectory: Deteriorating. Net liabilities have grown from (£1.1M) to (£2.9M) in one year, while cash has fallen from £277,869 to £12,119—a 96% decline. Total liabilities have nearly tripled year-on-year from £1.1M to £2.99M.
Capital Structure: Called-up share capital of £34.9M with share premium of £73.2M and other reserves of £39.4M demonstrate substantial historical investment, but the £150M accumulated P&L deficit confirms this capital has been entirely consumed and more.
3. Cash Flow Assessment: CRITICAL LIQUIDITY FAILURE
Cash Position: - 2019: £3,546,016 - 2020: £2,424,809 - 2021: £1,105,773 - 2022: £8,721 - 2023: £277,869 - 2024: £12,119
The company has effectively run out of cash. With only £12,119 remaining and current liabilities of £995,324, the current ratio is approximately 0.37x—far below the minimum 1.0x threshold for creditworthiness.
Debt Service Capacity: Non-existent. The company cannot service existing obligations, let alone new debt. Creditors falling due within one year (£995K) exceed current assets (£364K) by a factor of nearly 3:1.
Creditor Position: Long-term creditors of £2.99M (likely including group loans) further encumber the balance sheet. The company is entirely dependent on creditor forbearance and group support for continued operation—if liquidation had not already commenced.
4. Monitoring Points
If any counterparty exposure already exists, the following require immediate attention:
| Metric | Current Status | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidation status | Active liquidation | CRITICAL |
| Cash reserves | £12,119 | CRITICAL |
| Confirmation Statement | Overdue | WARNING |
| Going concern assertion | Maintained by directors | QUESTIONABLE |
| Group/related party creditor support | Unknown extent | MONITOR |
| PSC changes | Any change in control | MONITOR |
Key Concerns:
-
Liquidation Proceedings: The in_liquidation flag supersedes all other considerations. Verify the status and appointed liquidator through Companies House.
-
Director Responsibility: The directors' going concern assertion in the 2024 accounts (signed July 2025) appears inconsistent with the liquidation status. This warrants investigation.
-
Related Party Exposure: Investments in subsidiaries (£180K) and likely group company creditors suggest complex inter-company obligations that may not be recoverable.
-
Regulatory Compliance: The overdue confirmation statement indicates administrative neglect or inability, consistent with a company in distress.
-
PSC Stability: Multiple significant controllers with 25-50% holdings could create governance instability in a liquidation scenario.