FOCUS REFURBISHMENT LIMITED

Company number 04010469 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Investment Risk Assessment: FOCUS REFURBISHMENT LIMITED

1. Risk Rating: MEDIUM

Justification: The company demonstrates a healthy financial trajectory with consistently growing net assets and adequate liquidity ratios. However, the micro-entity filing status severely limits transparency, an overdue confirmation statement raises compliance concerns, and the rapid growth in current liabilities warrants scrutiny—particularly in the construction sector where cash flow management is critical.


2. Key Concerns

Concern 1: Rapid Growth in Current Liabilities

Current liabilities have increased by 61.4% year-on-year (from £51,197 to £82,650), outpacing the 30% growth in net assets. While current assets have also grown to maintain a reasonable current ratio, the source and nature of these liabilities cannot be determined from micro-entity accounts. In the construction sector, rising creditor balances can indicate payment stretching to suppliers, retention issues, or potential disputes—any of which could create cascading operational problems.

Concern 2: Overdue Confirmation Statement

The confirmation statement is marked as overdue (due by 22 June 2026 per the data, but flagged as YES). This suggests a lapse in basic statutory compliance. While not immediately material to solvency, it raises questions about administrative rigor and whether the directors are maintaining proper governance oversight. For a company with 25 years of trading history, this is an unforced error.

Concern 3: Micro-Entity Filing and Limited Transparency

The company files as a micro-entity, which provides minimal financial disclosure. There is no profit and loss account, no cash flow statement, no breakdown of current assets (trade debtors versus cash), and no distinction between trade creditors and other liabilities. This makes it impossible to assess working capital quality, margin performance, or cash conversion. The share capital of only £2 further limits insight into the company's capital structure—whether significant director loans exist is unknown.


3. Positive Indicators

Consistent and Strong Net Asset Growth

Net assets have grown from £23,903 (2020) to £102,795 (2025)—a fourfold increase over five years. This trajectory demonstrates sustained profitability and reinvestment in the business. The year-on-year growth has been unbroken since 2020, which is notable given the economic disruptions during that period.

Healthy Liquidity Position

The current ratio stands at approximately 1.98:1 (£163,839 current assets against £82,650 current liabilities), which is adequate for a construction business. There are no long-term liabilities reported, meaning the company is not carrying debt that could constrain future operations.

Longevity and Operational Stability

Incorporated in 2000, the company has traded for 25 years—a significant marker of resilience in the construction sector. Employee count has grown from 2 to 3, suggesting modest but real operational expansion. The business has clearly navigated multiple economic cycles successfully.


4. Due Diligence Notes

Priority Investigations:

  1. Composition of Current Liabilities: Request a full creditors breakdown to distinguish between trade creditors, accruals, director loans, and any HMRC liabilities. The 61.4% increase requires explanation—specifically whether it reflects normal trading growth or payment stress.

  2. Composition of Current Assets: The £163,839 figure needs disaggregation. How much is cash versus trade debtors? In construction, significant debtor balances can indicate slow-paying clients or retention sums held, which creates cash flow risk.

  3. Confirmation Statement Compliance: Clarify the status of the overdue confirmation statement and whether this has been resolved. Verify that the PSC register remains accurate—three shareholders each holding 25-50% creates potential governance complications.

  4. Fixed Asset Trajectory: Fixed assets declined from £28,808 to £21,606. Understand whether this reflects depreciation on aging equipment without replacement, or disposals. For a construction company, inadequate fixed asset investment could signal under-investment in operational capability.

  5. Related Party Transactions: With three Hilder family members as PSCs (Craig, Paula, and Robert), investigate whether there are inter-company transactions, director loan accounts, or guarantees that could affect the company's financial position.

  6. Sector-Specific Risks: Construction of commercial buildings is subject to cyclical demand, contractual disputes, and retention withholding. Assess the company's order book, contract pipeline, and concentration risk with key clients.

  7. Accounts Approval Timeline: The accounts were approved on 31 March 2026 for a 30 June 2025 year-end—a nine-month lag. While within statutory deadlines, this extended timeline limits data freshness for investment decisions.


Perspective: Investment Risk Assessor · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 7 August 2026