GABULOUS LIMITED

Company number 09624421 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Credit Analysis: GABULOUS LIMITED (09624421)

1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE

Reasoning: Gabulous Limited presents unacceptable credit risk for standard lending facilities. The company has experienced catastrophic erosion of its balance sheet over the past eight years, with net assets declining 98.7% from £299,419 (2017) to just £3,833 (2025). The company is perilously close to balance-sheet insolvency, with shareholders' funds representing a mere 2.6% of total liabilities. While a marginal improvement occurred in the latest year (£961 to £3,833), this is immaterial and does not offset the sustained pattern of value destruction. The minimal share capital of £12 and absence of retained profit reserves provide no cushion against adverse trading conditions.

Any material unexpected cost or revenue disruption would likely render the company balance-sheet insolvent. Credit exposure cannot be justified on standard terms.


2. Financial Strength: CRITICAL

Balance Sheet Deterioration – Net Assets Trend:

Year Net Assets Cash Liabilities Net Assets Movement
2025 £3,833 £147,398 £141,154 +£2,872
2024 £961 £174,253 £172,683 -£12,252
2023 £13,213 £176,544 £164,189 -£30,397
2022 £43,610 £274,664 £229,730 -£62,952
2021 £106,562 £278,620 £170,894 -£66,644
2020 £173,206 £341,627 £166,706 -£44,259
2019 £217,465 £343,053 £119,083 -£48,947
2018 £266,412 £374,127 £108,510 -£33,007
2017 £299,419 £398,863 £100,712

Key Concerns: - Equity virtually extinguished: Net assets of £3,833 against liabilities of £141,154 yields a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 37:1 – dangerously over-leveraged - Share capital nominal only: £12 in called-up share capital indicates shareholders have not reinvested capital to support the business - Retained earnings depleted: £3,821 in retained earnings represents the entirety of the company's equity cushion - Fixed assets negligible: Only £1,109 in tangible assets (furniture, fittings, equipment) – no meaningful asset base for security - Liabilities predominantly current: All £141,154 in liabilities fall due within one year, creating ongoing refinancing pressure

Asset Quality: Cash represents 99.97% of current assets. The company is essentially a cash shell with liabilities. There are no debtors, no inventory, and minimal fixed assets. This provides no diversification of asset risk but does mean the assets are liquid.


3. Cash Flow Assessment: MARGINAL

Liquidity Position: - Current ratio: £147,398 / £141,154 = 1.04x (dangerously thin) - Net current assets: £6,244 (2025), improved from £1,570 (2024) - Cash covers current liabilities by only 1.04x

Cash Trajectory: Cash has declined from £398,863 (2017) to £147,398 (2025) – a 63% reduction over eight years. The rate of cash burn has slowed considerably in recent years (£26,806 decline in FY2025 vs £97,014 in FY2022), which is a modest positive signal.

Working Capital Concerns: - The company appears to operate with minimal working capital requirements (media services business) - No trade debtors suggests either cash-based operations or minimal credit extended to clients - Accruals and deferred income of £3,520 represent a small liability - The absence of trade creditors in the balance sheet (or their inclusion within the single creditor line) limits visibility on supplier payment terms

Cash Generation vs. Cash Consumption: Without a profit and loss account (filleted/abridged), we cannot determine whether the slight improvement in net assets in 2025 arose from trading profits or other adjustments. The £2,872 improvement in net assets is consistent with a small profit or a reduction in drawings/dividends by the directors.


4. Monitoring Points

Critical Metrics to Watch:

  1. Net assets threshold: Monitor quarterly for approach toward negative net assets. Any movement below zero triggers technical insolvency and potential director personal liability for wrongful trading.

  2. Cash-to-current-liabilities ratio: Currently 1.04x – any deterioration below 1.0x means the company cannot meet all current liabilities from cash and would require creditor forbearance or additional funding.

  3. Creditor composition: The single creditor line of £141,154 requires investigation – is this trade creditors, director loans, HMRC liabilities, or a mix? Director loans would be more flexible; HMRC debts carry enforcement risk.

  4. Revenue and profitability trends: The filleted accounts deliberately suppress P&L information. Request management accounts to assess whether the business is generating operating profits or surviving on prior cash reserves.

  5. Director remuneration/drawings: Given the declining net assets, assess whether directors are extracting funds via dividends or salaries that exceed operating profits, thereby eroding the capital base.

  6. Related party transactions: With two family member directors/shareholders, related party transactions should be scrutinised for potential preferential treatment or asset stripping.

  7. Accruals and deferred income movement: Grew from £3,205 to £3,520 – monitor for accelerating growth which may indicate deferred revenue recognition or accumulating unpaid costs.

Sector Considerations: - Media representation services (SIC 73120) is competitive and can be talent-dependent - Revenue streams may be contract-based and potentially lumpy - The business model appears asset-light, which is typical but offers limited recovery value in insolvency


5. Additional Risk Factors

Corporate Governance: - Small family-controlled company (two directors, both PSCs) - Audit exemption claimed – no independent verification of financial statements - Abridged/filleted accounts reduce transparency significantly - No evidence of external oversight or non-executive direction

Filing Compliance: Accounts and confirmation statements are filed on time – this is a positive indicator of basic administrative competence.

Director Disqualifications: No records of disqualification orders against either director.


Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 12 August 2026