INVERFOLD LIMITED
Company number 03302618 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Credit Assessment: INVERFOLD LIMITED
1. Credit Opinion: DECLINE
Reasoning: Inverfold Limited presents an unacceptable credit risk for standard commercial lending facilities. The company has experienced a sustained and accelerating erosion of its equity position, with net assets declining 91% from £2.8M (2020) to £255k (2024). Leverage is extreme at approximately 40:1 (liabilities-to-equity), and the liquidity position is negligible with only £44k in current assets. The micro-entity filing status provides insufficient transparency into cash flows, revenue, and the nature of the £10.35M in fixed assets. The corporate director structure and Jersey-based administration further reduce operational visibility.
2. Financial Strength
Severe deterioration in balance sheet health:
| Metric | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | £2.81M | £2.43M | £1.96M | £1.33M | £255k |
| Year-on-Year Decline | - | £374k | £471k | £634k | £1.07M |
- Equity erosion is accelerating – the 2024 decline alone exceeds the combined losses of 2021-2023
- Gearing is critical – total liabilities (£10.14M) dwarf shareholders' funds (£255k) by a factor of ~40:1
- Fixed assets represent 99.6% of total assets at £10.35M, with no movement year-on-year, suggesting these may be illiquid investments or inter-company loans rather than operational assets
- Share capital of £100k means accumulated retained profits are only ~£155k, offering minimal buffer against further losses
Assessment: The balance sheet is technically solvent but fundamentally fragile. At the current rate of equity depletion, the company could reach negative net assets within 3-6 months.
3. Cash Flow Assessment
Extremely limited liquidity and no operational visibility:
- Current assets of only £44,410 – insufficient to service any meaningful debt obligation
- No current liabilities disclosed on the balance sheet, suggesting all obligations are long-term
- Zero employees – this is a passive vehicle, not a trading entity generating operating cash flow
- Long-term creditors increased by £1.07M in 2024 (from £9.07M to £10.14M), indicating either new borrowing or reclassification of obligations
- No P&L filed – micro-entity exemption means revenue, profit/loss, and cash flow data are unavailable
Critical unknowns: - Nature of the £10.35M in fixed assets (investments? loans to related parties? property?) - Terms and maturity profile of the £10.14M in long-term creditors - Whether the company generates any income or relies on parent/group funding - Related party exposures and inter-company obligations
Assessment: With no visible revenue generation capacity and minimal liquid assets, the company has no independent means to service debt. Repayment would be entirely dependent on the realisation of fixed assets or external support.
4. Monitoring Points
If any facility were considered (which is not recommended), the following would require ongoing surveillance:
- Net asset trajectory – Monthly monitoring of equity position; any further deterioration below £100k would signal imminent insolvency risk
- Long-term creditor composition – Identify the nature and terms of the £10.14M obligations; assess whether these are related-party loans or third-party debt with potential call rights
- Fixed asset quality – Determine whether the £10.35M in fixed assets represents realisable value or includes impaired investments
- Group/related party structure – Map the full group structure; Inverfold appears to be a holding vehicle within a larger structure – creditworthiness depends on the parent
- PSC relationships – Mr Chinn and Mr Whale both hold significant influence; clarify whether group support arrangements exist
- Filing compliance – While currently up to date, any deterioration in filing timeliness would be an early warning indicator
- Corporate director changes – Any changes to JTC Directors (UK) Limited or Castle Directors (UK) Limited appointments could signal restructuring
Additional Risk Factors
- Jersey-based administration (JTC) introduces cross-border complexity for enforcement
- Micro-entity accounts provide minimal financial transparency; full accounts would be required for any meaningful underwriting
- SIC Code 82990 (other business support services) is a catch-all classification providing little insight into actual business activities
- No audit – accounts are unaudited with no accountant's report, increasing reliance on director-prepared figures