ITQUEST CONSULTANTS (UK) LIMITED
Company number 05210706 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Financial Health Assessment: ITQUEST CONSULTANTS (UK) LIMITED
1. Financial Health Score: E
Explanation: This company is in a state of financial dormancy—comatose, to use a medical analogy. It has no trading pulse, minimal vital signs, and exists only as a shell with £100 in unpaid share capital. While not terminally ill (no insolvency proceedings), it is functionally inactive with a history of significant financial trauma.
2. Key Vital Signs
| Vital Sign | Reading | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | £100 (2025) | Minimal—barely registers on the monitor |
| Trading Status | Dormant since ~2020 | No heartbeat—company not trading |
| Cash Position | £0 disclosed | No circulating "blood" in the system |
| Share Capital | £100 (unpaid) | Token amount, not even paid up |
| Confirmation Statement | OVERDUE | Compliance fever—administrative neglect |
| Accounts Filing | Up to date | At least one vital sign is stable |
3. Diagnosis
What the Financial Data Reveals
Historical Trauma (2016-2019): The patient has a concerning medical history. Between 2016-2018, the company showed signs of acute financial distress:
- 2017: Modest health—£2,400 net assets, £20,900 cash
- 2018: Critical condition—net assets plummeted to £-277,850 (negative equity). Total liabilities of £212,000 far exceeded assets of £16,620. This was insolvency territory.
- 2019: Sudden "recovery" to £277,650 net assets—this was not organic healing but likely a debt write-off or forgiveness event, effectively financial surgery to remove the tumour of liabilities.
Current Condition (2020-2025):
Since 2020, the company has been in a persistent vegetative state—dormant. The filed accounts explicitly claim exemption under Section 480 of the Companies Act 2006 for dormant companies. Net assets have flatlined at £1 (2020-2023) then £100 (2024-2025).
Key Observations: - The accounts note the company "acted as an agent for a person"—this minimal activity keeps it technically alive but generates no income - Share capital of £100 remains called up but not paid—even the owner hasn't injected actual funds - Two PSCs each claiming >75% ownership suggests a data anomaly or complex structure that needs clarification
Symptoms of Concern:
- Administrative neglect — Overdue confirmation statement suggests the directors aren't monitoring the patient
- No revenue generation — Zero trading activity for 5+ years
- Historic insolvency — The 2018 balance sheet showed the company was technically insolvent
- Unpaid capital — Even the token £100 share capital hasn't been paid in
4. Recommendations
Immediate Treatment (Within 30 Days):
- File the overdue confirmation statement — This is a regulatory requirement and failure to comply risks Companies House penalties or strike-off proceedings
- Clarify PSC ownership — Two individuals cannot each own >75%; correct the register
Medium-Term Considerations:
- Decide on the company's purpose — If IT consultancy work is intended, develop a business plan and inject working capital. If not, consider voluntary strike-off to end maintenance costs
- Pay up the share capital — The £100 should be paid in if the company is to continue, demonstrating basic financial commitment
- Maintain annual compliance — Dormant companies still have filing obligations; set calendar reminders
Strategic Options:
- Option A — Revive: If there's a legitimate business purpose, capitalize properly and commence trading with adequate funding
- Option B — Euthanise gracefully: Apply for voluntary strike-off if the company serves no purpose. This is cleaner than waiting for Companies House to act
- Option C — Hold as shell: Maintain for future use, but ensure compliance obligations are met annually
Risk Assessment
| Risk Category | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Insolvency | Low | No active trading means no new debts, but also no income |
| Compliance | Medium-High | Overdue confirmation statement; potential strike-off risk |
| Director Liability | Low | Dormant status limits exposure, but filing failures persist |
| Reputational | Low | No public trading profile to damage |