JUPPS LIMITED
Company number 05076841 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Investment Risk Analysis: JUPPS LIMITED
1. Risk Rating: MEDIUM
Justification: JUPPS LIMITED is a long-established (21 years), solvent micro-entity with positive net assets and compliant filing history. However, the significant decline in net assets year-over-year (18.5% reduction from £48,995 to £39,934), limited financial disclosure due to micro-entity status, and the concentrated family ownership structure introduce meaningful uncertainty that prevents a lower risk classification. The company appears financially stable but is experiencing a deterioration in its equity position that warrants scrutiny.
2. Key Concerns
Concern 1: Declining Net Assets
Net assets fell from £48,995 (2024) to £39,934 (2025), a reduction of £9,061 or 18.5%. This continues a pattern of volatility—net assets peaked at approximately £49k in 2021 and 2024, but have now dropped to their lowest level since 2017. Without a profit and loss statement, it is unclear whether this erosion stems from trading losses, dividend extraction, or asset revaluations. The trajectory, if sustained, could compromise the company's buffer against financial stress.
Concern 2: Minimal Financial Transparency
As a micro-entity, JUPPS LIMITED files only a balance sheet with no profit and loss account, cash flow statement, or detailed notes. This makes it impossible to assess revenue trends, profitability, operating margins, or cash generation. The accounts provide no strategic report or directors' review beyond the statutory minimum. For institutional due diligence, this opacity is a material limitation.
Concern 3: Key Person and Concentration Risk
The company has only four employees (including both directors) and is controlled by two family members—Mr Nigel Jupp (50-75% share ownership) and Mrs Melanie Jupp (25-50% share ownership). The business is entirely dependent on the continued involvement and capability of these individuals. Any health, regulatory, or personal issues affecting either director could materially impact operations.
3. Positive Indicators
Long Operational Track Record
Incorporated in 2004, the company has operated continuously for over two decades. This longevity in the competitive accounting and tax consultancy sector demonstrates business resilience and market relevance.
Adequate Short-Term Liquidity
Net current assets improved from £32,156 to £34,428 year-over-year, and current assets (£77,973) comfortably exceed current liabilities (£43,545), yielding a current ratio of approximately 1.79x. For a professional services firm, this provides reasonable short-term financial cushion.
Compliant and Current Filing History
Both accounts and confirmation statements are filed on time with no overdue items. There are no disqualification records against the directors. This suggests competent administrative governance and reduces regulatory risk.
Reduced Creditor Exposure
Creditors falling due within one year decreased from £51,629 to £43,545 (a 15.7% reduction), indicating the company is managing its short-term obligations effectively and not expanding its trade payable position.
4. Due Diligence Notes
Profitability Assessment Required
The declining net assets strongly suggest either trading losses or significant dividend distributions. Request detailed P&L information directly from the company to determine which. If losses, understand their nature and whether they are exceptional or recurring. If dividends, assess whether extraction levels are sustainable relative to cash generation.
Cash Position Investigation
The balance sheet shows current assets of £77,973 but does not break these down between cash, debtors, and other items. For a professional services firm, the composition of current assets is critical—high debtor balances could indicate collection issues or revenue recognition concerns. Request an aged debtor analysis.
Fixed Asset Decline
Fixed assets fell from £21,511 to £11,537 (a 46.4% decline). Understand whether this reflects depreciation without replacement (suggesting reduced investment) or disposals. For an accounting practice, minimal fixed asset reinvestment may be acceptable, but sustained disinvestment could signal a run-down strategy.
Accruals and Deferred Income
Accruals and deferred income increased from £4,672 to £6,031. While modest in absolute terms, the 29% increase warrants clarification—is this deferred fees (potentially positive, indicating future revenue) or accrued costs (potentially negative, indicating unpaid obligations)?
Director Capacity and Succession
Given the key person dependency, assess whether there is any succession planning. Mr Nigel Jupp appears to be the sole director (Mrs Melanie Jupp is listed as secretary only). Understand the operational implications if either individual were unable to continue.
Related Party Transactions
Micro-entity accounts do not require disclosure of related party transactions. Given the family ownership structure, investigate whether there are loans, management charges, or other transactions between the company and its shareholders that could affect financial position or cash flow.
Regulatory Standing
As a firm engaged in accounting, auditing, and tax consultancy (SIC codes 69201, 69202, 69203), verify whether the company or its directors hold relevant professional registrations (ICAEW, ACCA, etc.) and whether any regulatory actions or complaints exist.