KPR ENGINEERING (M & E) LTD

Company number 06434180 ·

Active

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Credit Analysis: KPR Engineering (M & E) Ltd

1. Credit Opinion: CONDITIONAL APPROVE

KPR Engineering demonstrates a strongly improving financial trajectory with net assets nearly doubling year-on-year (£51,144 to £94,924) and a healthy cash position of £72,081. The company carries no long-term debt and maintains a current ratio of 2.44x, indicating robust liquidity. However, conditions are warranted due to: (i) significant debtor growth of 93.6% year-on-year requiring validation of collectability, (ii) single-director dependency creating key person risk, and (iii) the company's micro-entity status limiting disclosure transparency. Approval recommended with personal guarantee from the director and appropriate financial covenants.


2. Financial Strength

Balance Sheet Summary (FY2024):

Metric FY2024 FY2023 Change
Net Assets £94,924 £51,144 +85.6%
Cash £72,081 £44,761 +61.0%
Trade Debtors £82,078 £42,395 +93.6%
Trade Creditors £34,338 £20,221 +69.8%
Current Ratio 2.44x 2.29x Improved

Positive Indicators: - Net assets have grown consistently since 2021, recovering from a COVID-era dip to reach the strongest position in the company's 17-year history - Retained profits increased by £43,780 (from £49,892 to £93,672), confirming genuine profitability - Long-term liabilities cleared entirely (down from £2,104 to nil) - Share capital remains stable at £1,252 — no dilution or capital restructuring - Tangible fixed assets minimal at £918 (net), indicating an asset-light business model typical of M&E contracting

Areas of Concern: - Trade debtors represent 51.6% of current assets — concentration risk if few large customers - Debtors nearly doubled year-on-year without proportional revenue disclosure (micro-entity accounts don't show turnover) - The PSC register entry is generic ("Persons with significant control statement") rather than naming the controller — transparency gap

Historical Resilience: The company weathered the 2019-2021 period (likely COVID-impacted) with net assets dipping to £33,361 before recovering strongly. This demonstrates business resilience and adaptive management capability.


3. Cash Flow Assessment

Liquidity Position — STRONG:

Metric Value Assessment
Current Ratio 2.44x Well above 1.5x benchmark
Quick Ratio 2.37x Excellent — minimal stock dependency
Cash/Current Liabilities 1.11x Cash alone covers all short-term obligations
Working Capital £94,006 Substantial buffer

Working Capital Analysis: - Net current assets of £94,006 provide a comfortable operating cushion - Cash represents 45.3% of current assets — strong liquid position - Stock levels minimal at £5,000, suggesting just-in-time procurement or work-in-progress only - No bank overdraft or short-term borrowing facilities visible in creditors

Cash Generation: - Cash increased by £27,320 during the year despite retained profits of £43,780 - The difference (£16,460) reflects working capital absorption, primarily through increased trade debtors - Taxation and social security liabilities increased from £3,885 to £10,452, consistent with higher profitability

Director Loan Account: - £4,042 owed by the director to the company — positive sign that the director is not extracting excessive funds - No indication of overdrawn director's account


4. Monitoring Points

Priority 1 — Debtor Quality & Collection: - Trade debtors grew 93.6% — request aged debtor analysis and top-5 customer concentrations - Validate debtor days to assess whether growth is proportional to revenue or indicates collection deterioration - Monitor for potential bad debt risk if customer base is concentrated

Priority 2 — Key Person Dependency: - Single director (Anthony Marsh) creates significant key person risk - Require personal guarantee as condition of facility - Consider key person insurance as a facility requirement

Priority 3 — Revenue & Margin Validation: - Micro-entity accounts don't disclose turnover or profit & loss — request management accounts - Validate that debtor and creditor growth is proportionate to revenue growth - Seek confirmation of gross margins typical for M&E subcontracting (normally 15-25%)

Priority 4 — Creditor Stretch: - Trade creditors grew 69.8% — monitor whether this reflects normal trading growth or supplier payment stretching - Creditor days analysis recommended to ensure the company isn't funding growth through delayed supplier payments

Priority 5 — Ongoing Financial Covenants: - Minimum current ratio: 1.5x - Maximum leverage: Net assets must not fall below £50,000 - Prompt filing of annual accounts (currently compliant)

Sector Consideration: M&E subcontracting can be cyclical and project-dependent. Monitor for over-reliance on single contracts or customers. The manufacturing classification (SIC 27900) alongside the company name suggests electrical/mechanical installation work — typically operating within construction supply chains where payment delays are common.


Perspective: Business Credit Analyst · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 31 August 2026