KPR ENGINEERING (M & E) LTD
Company number 06434180 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Credit Analysis: KPR Engineering (M & E) Ltd
1. Credit Opinion: CONDITIONAL APPROVE
KPR Engineering demonstrates a strongly improving financial trajectory with net assets nearly doubling year-on-year (£51,144 to £94,924) and a healthy cash position of £72,081. The company carries no long-term debt and maintains a current ratio of 2.44x, indicating robust liquidity. However, conditions are warranted due to: (i) significant debtor growth of 93.6% year-on-year requiring validation of collectability, (ii) single-director dependency creating key person risk, and (iii) the company's micro-entity status limiting disclosure transparency. Approval recommended with personal guarantee from the director and appropriate financial covenants.
2. Financial Strength
Balance Sheet Summary (FY2024):
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2023 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Assets | £94,924 | £51,144 | +85.6% |
| Cash | £72,081 | £44,761 | +61.0% |
| Trade Debtors | £82,078 | £42,395 | +93.6% |
| Trade Creditors | £34,338 | £20,221 | +69.8% |
| Current Ratio | 2.44x | 2.29x | Improved |
Positive Indicators: - Net assets have grown consistently since 2021, recovering from a COVID-era dip to reach the strongest position in the company's 17-year history - Retained profits increased by £43,780 (from £49,892 to £93,672), confirming genuine profitability - Long-term liabilities cleared entirely (down from £2,104 to nil) - Share capital remains stable at £1,252 — no dilution or capital restructuring - Tangible fixed assets minimal at £918 (net), indicating an asset-light business model typical of M&E contracting
Areas of Concern: - Trade debtors represent 51.6% of current assets — concentration risk if few large customers - Debtors nearly doubled year-on-year without proportional revenue disclosure (micro-entity accounts don't show turnover) - The PSC register entry is generic ("Persons with significant control statement") rather than naming the controller — transparency gap
Historical Resilience: The company weathered the 2019-2021 period (likely COVID-impacted) with net assets dipping to £33,361 before recovering strongly. This demonstrates business resilience and adaptive management capability.
3. Cash Flow Assessment
Liquidity Position — STRONG:
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.44x | Well above 1.5x benchmark |
| Quick Ratio | 2.37x | Excellent — minimal stock dependency |
| Cash/Current Liabilities | 1.11x | Cash alone covers all short-term obligations |
| Working Capital | £94,006 | Substantial buffer |
Working Capital Analysis: - Net current assets of £94,006 provide a comfortable operating cushion - Cash represents 45.3% of current assets — strong liquid position - Stock levels minimal at £5,000, suggesting just-in-time procurement or work-in-progress only - No bank overdraft or short-term borrowing facilities visible in creditors
Cash Generation: - Cash increased by £27,320 during the year despite retained profits of £43,780 - The difference (£16,460) reflects working capital absorption, primarily through increased trade debtors - Taxation and social security liabilities increased from £3,885 to £10,452, consistent with higher profitability
Director Loan Account: - £4,042 owed by the director to the company — positive sign that the director is not extracting excessive funds - No indication of overdrawn director's account
4. Monitoring Points
Priority 1 — Debtor Quality & Collection: - Trade debtors grew 93.6% — request aged debtor analysis and top-5 customer concentrations - Validate debtor days to assess whether growth is proportional to revenue or indicates collection deterioration - Monitor for potential bad debt risk if customer base is concentrated
Priority 2 — Key Person Dependency: - Single director (Anthony Marsh) creates significant key person risk - Require personal guarantee as condition of facility - Consider key person insurance as a facility requirement
Priority 3 — Revenue & Margin Validation: - Micro-entity accounts don't disclose turnover or profit & loss — request management accounts - Validate that debtor and creditor growth is proportionate to revenue growth - Seek confirmation of gross margins typical for M&E subcontracting (normally 15-25%)
Priority 4 — Creditor Stretch: - Trade creditors grew 69.8% — monitor whether this reflects normal trading growth or supplier payment stretching - Creditor days analysis recommended to ensure the company isn't funding growth through delayed supplier payments
Priority 5 — Ongoing Financial Covenants: - Minimum current ratio: 1.5x - Maximum leverage: Net assets must not fall below £50,000 - Prompt filing of annual accounts (currently compliant)
Sector Consideration: M&E subcontracting can be cyclical and project-dependent. Monitor for over-reliance on single contracts or customers. The manufacturing classification (SIC 27900) alongside the company name suggests electrical/mechanical installation work — typically operating within construction supply chains where payment delays are common.