MOJO LTD
Company number 05187660 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Credit Analysis: MOJO LTD (05187660)
1. Credit Opinion: CONDITIONAL
Reasoning: MOJO LTD presents a mixed credit profile. While the latest year-end (January 2025) shows a return to positive net assets of £28,891 after a prior-year deficit of (£2,665), this improvement is largely driven by a dramatic increase in debtors rather than cash generation. Cash has fallen from £88,715 to £11,635, and the debtor book has grown from £5,861 to £59,982 — with £53,174 classified as amounts due from group undertakings and "other debtors," raising serious questions about asset quality and collectibility. The company's 10-year history reveals persistent financial instability, with negative net assets in 7 of the past 10 years. Any credit facility should be subject to stringent conditions including covenants around related-party exposures and cash flow monitoring.
2. Financial Strength
Balance Sheet Volatility — Significant Concern
The company's net asset position has been highly erratic over the past decade:
| Year | Net Assets | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | (£85,546) | Deeply insolvent |
| 2017 | (£50,970) | Improving |
| 2018 | (£47,712) | Improving |
| 2019 | (£29,997) | Improving |
| 2020 | (£29,623) | Flat |
| 2021 | (£58,986) | Significant deterioration |
| 2022 | (£24,031) | Recovery |
| 2023 | £37,168 | Positive |
| 2024 | (£2,665) | Deterioration |
| 2025 | £28,891 | Recovery |
The pattern of oscillation between positive and negative net assets suggests a business that lacks structural financial stability. The company has been technically insolvent (negative net assets) in 7 of the last 10 years, which would typically constrain lending capacity.
Capital Structure: - Share capital remains at just £100 — no equity injection to support the business - P&L reserve has moved from (£2,765) to £28,791, reflecting accumulated profits - No evidence of external equity investment; the business appears to rely on director loans and group undertakings for funding
Leverage Concerns: - Total liabilities of £62,561 (including long-term) against total assets of £76,817 gives a debt-to-asset ratio of approximately 81% - Long-term bank loans of £4,000 remain on the balance sheet - The apparent deleveraging from £107,301 to £58,561 in current liabilities is largely explained by the repayment of director loans (£15,517) and reduction in group undertaking debts (£40,066 down to £66), rather than operational debt reduction
3. Cash Flow Assessment
Liquidity Position — Weakening Despite Balance Sheet Improvement
Working Capital: - Current assets: £76,817 - Current liabilities: £58,561 - Net current assets: £18,256 (improved from £8,625 deficit in 2024)
While working capital is now positive, the composition is concerning:
| Current Asset Component | 2025 | 2024 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inventories | £5,200 | £4,100 | +£1,100 |
| Trade debtors | £295 | £0 | +£295 |
| Group undertaking debtors | £22,500 | £0 | +£22,500 |
| Other debtors | £30,674 | £0 | +£30,674 |
| Accrued income | £6,513 | £5,861 | +£652 |
| Cash | £11,635 | £88,715 | -£77,080 |
Critical Observations:
-
Cash Drain: Cash has fallen by £77,080 (87% decline). The primary uses appear to be repayment of director loans (£15,517), reduction in group undertaking payables (£40,000), and reduction in long-term bank debt (£8,000). This represents a deliberate de-leveraging but has left the company with minimal liquidity.
-
Debtor Quality Risk: £53,174 of the £59,982 debtor balance relates to group undertakings and "other debtors." These are not trade debtors and may be difficult to realise. The sudden appearance of these balances warrants investigation — they could represent intercompany funding arrangements rather than genuine receivables.
-
Tax Liability: Taxes and social security have increased from £28,549 to £41,715 — a 46% increase. This represents a significant creditor and potential cash drain if not being managed through HMRC time-to-pay arrangements.
-
Current Ratio: 76,817 ÷ 58,561 = 1.31 — marginally adequate but heavily reliant on uncertain debtor balances.
-
Quick Ratio (excluding inventory and group/other debtors): (11,635 + 295 + 6,513) ÷ 58,561 = 0.31 — critically low, indicating the company cannot meet short-term obligations from liquid assets.
4. Monitoring Points
| Metric | Current | Threshold | Action Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash position | £11,635 | Below £5,000 | Immediate review |
| Net current assets | £18,256 | Below £0 | Formal default |
| Related party debtors | £53,174 | Any increase | Enhanced monitoring |
| Tax liabilities | £41,715 | Any increase | Verify HMRC status |
| Director loans (repaid) | £0 | New loans advanced | Review purpose |
| Filing compliance | Current | Overdue | Escalation |
Key Monitoring Recommendations:
-
Intercompany Exposures: Request full details of the £22,500 due from group undertakings and £30,674 other debtors — repayment terms, counterparty creditworthiness, and whether these are truly recoverable within 12 months.
-
Tax Position: Confirm whether the £41,715 tax liability is subject to any HMRC time-to-pay arrangement and obtain clearance certificates where applicable.
-
Cash Flow Forecasting: Given the critically low quick ratio, request 12-month cash flow projections to assess whether the business can service any new debt obligations.
-
Group Structure: Obtain a group structure chart to understand the relationship with related entities and assess contagion risk.
-
Trading Performance: The P&L has not been filed (permitted under small companies regime). Request management accounts to verify the business is trading profitably and not relying on balance sheet adjustments.
-
Debtor Ageing: Request aged debtor analysis, particularly for the £53,174 in group/other debtors.
-
Director Character: Note the director name discrepancy (Jacobs vs Elliott in the accounts sign-off). Clarify the current directorship position.