M.T. TECHNICAL SERVICES LIMITED
Company number 04100339 · Monitor this company
This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.
Financial Health Assessment — M.T. Technical Services Limited
Companies House No. 04100339 · Electrical Installation (SIC 43210) · Brentwood, Essex Latest full accounts: year ended 30 November 2025 (unaudited, small company regime)
1. Financial Health Score
Grade: B — "Stable constitution, showing symptoms of a hard year"
Why a B and not higher: the balance sheet is genuinely robust — £226k of cash, £267k of net assets, almost no bank debt, and a 25-year trading record with filings fully up to date. On pure solvency and liquidity, this company is in the top tier of small electrical contractors.
Why not an A: the patient lost weight fast. Total assets fell 46% in one year, cash fell 52%, headcount fell from 11 to 9, and shareholders' funds fell £107,673 (28.7%). That is a material contraction, and because small companies are exempt from filing a profit and loss account, we cannot see from the public record whether that £107,673 was a trading loss, a dividend, or both. That is the single biggest diagnostic blind spot in this file.
Trend arrow: ↘ — the score is stable but the trajectory is downward from a 2023 peak.
2. Key Vital Signs
The pulse: liquidity
| Metric | 2025 | 2024 | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 2.68 | 1.90 | Strong. £2.68 of short-term assets per £1 of short-term debt |
| Quick ratio (excl. stock) | 2.15 | 1.65 | Strong — liquidity is not dependent on selling stock |
| Cash ratio | 1.61 | 1.27 | Excellent — cash alone covers short-term creditors 1.6× |
| Cash | £226,473 | £476,881 | Down £250,408 (52.5%) |
| Net current assets (working capital) | £235,175 | £338,203 | Down £103,028 but still substantial |
Interpretation: the circulatory system is in good order. Cash covers all liabilities — current, long-term and provisions — 1.29 times over. There is no liquidity crisis here, and no sign of the classic contractor's disease (owing HMRC while chasing debtors).
The skeleton: solvency and capital structure
| Metric | 2025 | 2024 | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net assets (shareholders' funds) | £267,085 | £374,758 | Positive, but down 28.7% |
| Total liabilities | £175,090 | £439,817 | Down 60% |
| Liabilities ÷ equity | 0.66 | 1.17 | Balance sheet has strengthened, not weakened |
| Equity as % of total assets | 60.4% | 46.0% | Conservative funding structure |
| Bank loans (current + non-current) | £5,286 | £15,661 | Effectively repaid |
| Net cash position | ~£221,187 | ~£461,220 | Net cash positive |
Interpretation: the company is funded almost entirely by its own reserves. There is no gearing risk, no covenant exposure, and no refinancing cliff. The 2009 fixed and floating charge in favour of HSBC still sits over all assets — a legacy "implant" from when borrowing was larger, and now largely unnecessary.
The metabolic rate: profitability (inferred)
| Indicator | Movement | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Profit and loss reserve | £374,658 → £266,985 (−£107,673) | Either a trading loss, a dividend, or a mix — not disclosed |
| Trade debtors | £135,029 → £72,942 (−46%) | Revenue likely fell materially |
| Stock | £95,222 → £73,200 (−23%) | Lower activity, or deliberate destocking |
| Employees | 11 → 9 (−18%) | Capacity reduced in line with workload |
| Disposal of fixed assets | Cost £26,268, NBV £12,005 eliminated | Possible small gain on disposal |
| Depreciation charge | £22,979 | Consistent with asset base |
Interpretation: the debtor reduction is the clearest vital sign. Trade debtors halving, stock down a quarter, and two staff fewer all point the same way — turnover almost certainly fell sharply in the year to November 2025. A £107,673 hit to reserves on top of that is a symptom worth investigating, not ignoring.
The immune response: compliance and governance
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| Accounts filing | ✅ Up to date, not overdue (approved 6 July 2026) |
| Confirmation statement | ✅ Current, next due 20 October 2027 |
| Company status | ✅ Active, not in liquidation or administration |
| Audit | Exempt (small company, s.477) — normal and legitimate |
| Directors | name shown to subscribers and name shown to subscribers — both current, both PSCs (25–50% each) |
| Director conduct records | No disqualification records identified |
| Charge register | HSBC fixed & floating charge dated 26 January 2009 |
Interpretation: the administrative immune system is functioning. No red flags, no late filings, no insolvency markers. One minor housekeeping blemish: the accounts carry "no description of principal activity."
3. Diagnosis
Primary finding: a solvent, cash-rich business undergoing a sharp contraction — "robust patient, losing weight"
What the numbers actually say. This is not a distressed company. A distressed electrical contractor looks like this: current ratio below 1, HMRC arrears building, trade creditors stretching, negative net assets, directors' loans propping up the balance sheet. M.T. Technical Services looks like the opposite of that — it has £226k in the bank, owes HMRC £40,890 and trade suppliers £65,755, and could clear every creditor tomorrow and still hold £51,383.
What actually happened in FY2025. Reading the cash flow implied by the balance sheet: cash fell £250,408, but £234,388 of that was deliberate — current liabilities were paid down hard (trade creditors −£119,325, tax and social security −£77,704, other creditors −£32,270). Debtors released £62,087 and stock released £22,022. So the picture is of a company that collected its receivables, ran down its stock, and cleared its creditors — a balance sheet clean-up, funded from cash, alongside a £107,673 reduction in reserves.
Three plausible readings of the £107,673:
- A genuine trading loss. Revenue fell (debtors −46%), overheads are largely fixed (9 staff, premises, vehicles), so a loss is entirely credible. This is the "unwelcome diagnosis."
- A large dividend. The P&L reserve of £266,985 is fully distributable. Two owner-directors in their later careers may simply be extracting accumulated profits. This is the "benign diagnosis."
- Both — a modest loss plus a normal dividend. Most likely.
Why this matters: the treatment is completely different. A loss needs a commercial response; a dividend needs only documentation and succession planning. The public record cannot distinguish between them, and that ambiguity is the single most important thing to resolve.
Secondary observations:
- Key-person concentration. Nine employees, two of whom are the only directors and joint controlling shareholders. If either steps back, the business has no visible management bench.
- Idle capital. £226,473 in cash against £5,286 of bank debt is a very large liquid buffer for a business of this size. Cash held in a low-interest business account is a slow-moving asset — safe, but not working.
- Stock watch. £73,200 of stock against falling activity warrants an obsolescence review; electrical materials date quickly against current regulations.
- The HSBC debenture. A fixed and floating charge over all present and future assets, granted in 2009, is a meaningful constraint on future financing flexibility and should be reviewed now that borrowings are trivial.
- Long-run resilience is real. Look at the ten-year arc: current ratio has climbed from 1.05 (2018) to 2.68 (2025); net assets went from £31,393 (2018) to a £450,039 peak (2023). Whatever happened in FY2025, this is a business that has been built, not eroded.
4. Prognosis
Base case (most likely) — "stable with reduced activity." Cash of £226k and net assets of £267k give an exceptionally long runway. Even if the company made losses at the FY2025 rate, it would take over two years to exhaust reserves — and it would not need to, because it can cut variable costs further. Expect a smaller, leaner, still-profitable business.
Downside case — "progressive thinning." If revenue continues to fall and overheads are not flexed, reserves erode at roughly £100k a year. Three years of that would take net assets below £50k and force genuine strategic decisions. The warning sign to watch is a second consecutive fall in trade debtors alongside a further reserves reduction.
Upside case — "well-capitalised and under-leveraged." The balance sheet is clean enough to fund a serious push: new contracts, additional qualified electricians (the sector has a persistent skills shortage), EV charge-point or solar/battery installation capability, or a bolt-on acquisition. Very few competitors of this size have £221k of net cash.
Overall prognosis: favourable, conditional on understanding FY2025. The financial constitution is strong; the symptoms are of a difficult trading year or a deliberate extraction of value, not of underlying disease.
5. Recommendations
Diagnostic (do first — within 30 days)
- Reconstruct the FY2025 profit and loss account internally. Even though it isn't filed, produce it. Split the £107,673 movement between trading result and dividends. Everything else follows from this.
- Confirm dividend documentation. If any part was a dividend, ensure board minutes, dividend vouchers and distributable-reserves evidence exist. Undocumented dividends are a classic, avoidable tax risk in owner-managed companies.
- Age the debtor and creditor ledgers. £72,942 of trade debtors and £40,890 of tax and social security should be reconciled line by line. Confirm no CIS, PAYE or VAT arrears are embedded.
Therapeutic (next 3–6 months)
- Set a cash policy. Define an operating buffer (typically 3–6 months of fixed costs) and treat the excess above it as deployable — either reinvested, distributed tax-efficiently via pension contributions, or held in higher-yielding deposits.
- Review stock for obsolescence. £73,200 against falling activity. Write down anything not used in 12 months; it improves the quality of the net asset figure.
- Ask HSBC to release the 2009 debenture. With £5,286 of borrowing outstanding, the charge no longer serves a purpose and restricts future options.
- Flex the cost base to the new revenue level. Nine staff and a vehicle fleet carry fixed costs. Model the break-even revenue and manage to it deliberately rather than by attrition.
Preventive (next 12 months)
- Address key-person risk. Cross-train a senior employee, document processes, and consider key-person cover. With two owner-directors and nine staff, this is the largest uninsured exposure.
- Plan the succession or exit route. Both directors are also the only shareholders. Whether the goal is a trade sale, a management buyout, or an orderly wind-down, that decision should be made while the balance sheet is strong — not forced later by declining reserves.
- Consider a growth decision. The company is under-leveraged relative to its sector. Certification in EV charging, solar PV or battery storage would put the cash pile to work in a market with structural demand.
- Fix the small things. Add a description of principal activity to the next accounts; keep the filing calendar visible (accounts due 31 August 2027).