NEON DIGITAL DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Company number 05477386 ·

Dissolved

This analysis was written by an AI from the company's public filings. It may contain errors or omissions and is not financial or professional advice.

Investment Risk Analysis: NEON DIGITAL DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED

1. Risk Rating: HIGH

The company exhibits severe financial distress across multiple dimensions. It is insolvent on both a net assets basis (£-155,098) and a net current assets basis (£-283,116), has been in a net liability position since at least 2018, and carries a dissolved status. The combination of deep insolvency, deteriorating trajectory, and entity dissolution renders this a high-risk proposition with significant uncertainty around creditor recovery.


2. Key Concerns

Concern 1: Persistent and Deepening Insolvency The company has been technically insolvent since 2018, with net liabilities worsening from £-121,263 (2019) to £-155,098 (2020). Current liabilities of £410,758 dwarf current assets of £127,642, leaving the company unable to meet its obligations as they fall due. Total liabilities exceed total assets by nearly 2.8 times.

Concern 2: Dramatic Financial Deterioration in 2018 The swing from net assets of £+89,621 (2017) to net liabilities of £-321,208 (2018) represents a deterioration of approximately £411,000 in a single year. Cash holdings collapsed from £258,302 to £18,510 in the same period. Without a detailed breakdown (micro-entity filings provide minimal disclosure), the cause of this catastrophic decline cannot be determined from available data, which itself is a material concern.

Concern 3: Dissolved Status and Governance Concentration The company carries a dissolved status, meaning it is no longer a going concern. Combined with a single director (Mr Daniel Stevens) holding over 75% of shares, voting rights, and the right to appoint/remove directors, there is extreme concentration of control with no independent oversight. The registered address discrepancy between the overview (Northampton) and filed accounts (Ware, Herts) may indicate administrative irregularities during the wind-down period.


3. Positive Indicators

  • Historical Trading Longevity: The company operated for approximately 15 years since incorporation in 2005, demonstrating some historical viability prior to the 2018 deterioration.
  • Partial Recovery in 2019: Net liabilities improved from £-321,208 (2018) to £-121,263 (2019), suggesting some remedial action was taken, though this was not sustained into 2020.
  • Filing Compliance: Accounts and confirmation statements were not flagged as overdue at the time of the last filings, indicating basic administrative compliance was maintained.

4. Due Diligence Notes

Item Investigation Required
Cause of 2018 collapse The ~£411k swing requires explanation — potential bad debt write-off, litigation, or trading losses. Micro-entity accounts provide no narrative.
Provisions of £160,987 Significant provision relative to company size; nature and timing of expected outflows should be established.
New long-term creditor (£50,000) Appeared in 2020 with no equivalent in 2019. Identify the creditor and terms.
Director's loan position Given minimal share capital (£200) and deep insolvency, the company likely relied on director funding. The extent of any loan or personal guarantees is critical for creditor assessment.
Related party transactions Micro-entity exemptions mean no related party disclosure is required. Any transactions between Mr Stevens and the company are opaque.
Dissolution circumstances Confirm whether dissolution was voluntary (strike-off) or compulsory. Establish whether creditors were properly notified and whether any recovery actions are pending.
Cash position post-2018 Cash data is unavailable for 2019 and 2020. Given the 2018 figure of only £18,510, liquidity may have been critically constrained.
Creditor composition £410,758 in current liabilities is material for a micro-entity. Identify whether this includes HMRC arrears, trade creditors, or inter-company balances.

Perspective: Investment Risk Assessor · Model: glm-5.1 · Generated 27 August 2026