LAWSON SCIENTIFIC LIMITED
Company number 11438299 · Monitor this company
Free AI analysis
Have an AI read this company's filings and write an assessment — financial health, risks, and what the numbers say.
Shareholders' funds
£4,236
Balance sheet as at 2020-06-30
What it does
The principal activity of the company is Supplier of Scientific Instruments
The company's own description, from its latest filed accounts.
Overview
- Company type
- Private Limited Company
- Incorporated
- 2018-06-28
- Employees
- 4 (2025 accounts)
- Registered office
- Unit 3 Clipstone Brook Industrial Estate, Cherrycourt Way, Leighton Buzzard, England, LU7 4GP
- Postcode
- LU7 4GP
- Capital
- 10 GBP
- Accounts category
- Unaudited Abridged
- Charges
- 0 outstanding
Accounts
- Last made up to
- 2025-06-30
- Next due by
- 2027-03-31
- Financial year end
- 30 June
Confirmation statement
- Last statement dated
- 2026-07-12
- Next due by
- 2027-07-26
Nature of business (SIC)
- 72190 Other research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering
Officers 3 current · 1 resigned
Group structure
Controlled by MERITICS LIMITED — since 2020-06-15
From persons-with-significant-control filings on the public register.
Contact details
- Website
- lawsonscientific.co.uk
Comparing FlowCam Results with Light Obscuration: A Study by Japan's National Institute of Health SciencesIn their recent publication, Quantitative Evaluation of Insoluble Particulate Matters in Therapeutic Protein Injections Using Light Obscuration and Flow Imaging Methods, Shibata et. al. compare the ability of Light Obscuration and Flow Imaging to detect and accurately characterize subvisible particles in injectable drugs.The team at Japan's National Institute of Health Sciences write the following:Flow imaging (FI) has emerged as a powerful tool to evaluate insoluble particles derived from protein aggregates as an orthogonal method to light obscuration (LO). However, few reports directly compare the FI and LO method in the size and number of protein particles in commercially available therapeutic protein injections. In this study, we measured the number of insoluble particles in several therapeutic protein injections using both FI and LO, and characterized these particles to compare the analytical performance of the methods. The particle counts measured using FI were much higher than those measured using LO, and the difference depended on the products or features of particles. Some products contained a large number of transparent and elongated particles, which could escape detection using LO. Our results also suggested that the LO method underestimates the size and number of silicone oil droplets in prefilled syringe products compared to the FI method. The count of particles ≥10mm in size in one product measured using FI exceeded the criteria (6000 counts per container) defined in the compendial particulate matter test using the LO method. Thus precaution should be taken when setting the acceptance criteria of specification tests using the FI method.Read the full publication in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.The results of this study corroborate the results produced in our FlowCam lab, comparing particle counts and sizes produced by the two technologies in our new instrument, FlowCam LO.Our recently produced White Paper, "Measuring Subvisible Particles and Aggregates Using FlowCam LO", uses FlowCam LO to directly compare the particle size distributions of aqueous samples containing Polystyrene Latex calibration beads, ETFE particles, and IgG aggregates. Download our White Paper to see the results of the study.FlowCam LO uses two orthogonal techniques in a single instrument by combining our patented flow imaging microscopy technology with an embedded light obscuration particle counter. FlowCam LO provides an even more direct particle count comparison because a single aliquot of sample is analysed by both technologies in one sample run, instead of two samples from the same vial or syringe.FIM is available in our contract analysis laboratory - please contact us for a quote
Previous registered addresses 1
| Address | Changed on |
|---|---|
| QUEENSGATE HOUSE 23 NORTH PARK ROAD, HARROGATE, NORTH YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PD, UNITED KINGDOM | 2020-06-16 |
At this address
2nd largest employer
of 12 similar companies in LU — measured against the wider sector, with 4 staff.
Competitors Luton
This company ranks 5 among other research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering in Luton.
The class of 2018
38%
of the 540 companies in this sector incorporated in 2018 are still active today; 58% have since been dissolved.
A fact about the year, not a forecast for this company.